by AaronEF8 » July 17th, 2012, 4:10 pm
: braad, LUXO_8 Likes this post
Another bump.
MOTOR magazine tested an EcoBoost G6E against a Mercedes E200 and Audi A6 2.0 TFSi in this months issue, with an automatic XR6 tagging along for the lols.
G6E cleaned up. Was the most powerful, fastest and cheapest (by $40k), with just the interior and equipment letting it down, which you'd expect when comparing it to an A6 and E-Class. But you could fuel the G6E for 300,000km with the savings instead of buying either Euro car.
The Audi returned 9.0L/100km, G6E 9.3L and Merc 9.6L. But the Audi and Mercedes have to have 95RON minimum, whereas the G6E takes 91 or E10. The G6E was getting 6.0L/100 @ 110km/h on a highway too.
16.34@85.31mph, 0-100 in 8.88 sec for the Mercedes.
16.66@84.23mph, 0-100 in 9.05 sec for the Audi.
15.49@92.3mph, 0-100 in 7.75 sec for the G6E.
15.4 @92.1mph, 0-100 in 7.29 sec for the XR6. The XR6 also returned 10.5L/100km on the same drive, so it's not exactly half bad either.
There was an interesting note that the EcoBoost feels like it's had the shifts softened up in the ZF auto, possibly so it doesn't beat the XR6. It also feels a lot better through the steering apparently, and the EcoBoost is much smoother than the 6cyl high in the revs.
Perhaps Ford could start advertising this shit, so they could actually sell some.
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...