Rollin wrote:The ones in Todds car are that stuffed the car is actually dangerous to drive in my opinion, and I think they're only a few years old, maybe 3? Not sure.
nstg8a wrote:lol, im thinking teabagging has a different meaning here in oz compared to nz? cos thats the last thing id be thinking of doing to someone that sideswiped my car...
donno wrote:http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/
Just do it anyway.
I don't think you even need bulk technical specs, just a concept and a few pictures/sketches. IIRC it's like $80 for a provisional patent which lasts a year, and it can be submitted online.
Parfrey wrote:I strongly urge everyone to boost everything haha.
NUT347 wrote:Ali G hooked car battery's together with humans and managed to blow a safe open so I can't see why not.
wicksy wrote:I would rather buy off Rollin than you though
CMYWPN wrote:$1300? Damn, thats steep. Im in the process of making something similar out of aircraft grade 7079-T6 alloy. Maybe its cos i have access to the CNC's, or cos i can draw the CAD file myslef, but my cost is only half that....
wierd.
Parfrey wrote:I strongly urge everyone to boost everything haha.
LUXO_8 wrote:CMYWPN wrote:$1300? Damn, thats steep. Im in the process of making something similar out of aircraft grade 7079-T6 alloy. Maybe its cos i have access to the CNC's, or cos i can draw the CAD file myslef, but my cost is only half that....
wierd.
Sounds like a whole lot of spin to me. At least Dan has done it an actually has a set of arms in his possession
nstg8a wrote:lol, im thinking teabagging has a different meaning here in oz compared to nz? cos thats the last thing id be thinking of doing to someone that sideswiped my car...
EFFalcon wrote:I think thats exactly the type of discussion he was after.
Rollin might be able to use it to ask the right questions of those he's been in contact with.
sdoylie wrote::shock: holy f'n crap CMYWPN. thats intense. why would you not share these crazy aricraft arms?
you two could work together on them. seem to be on the same wave length.
Rollin wrote: The missing numbers would want to be vastly different to justify the sooking you're going on about.
Rollin wrote:Did some gooooogling.
nothin suss wrote:Why would we care about what axis and movements the machine does?
Just combine your findings and create something the boys can use!
CMYWPN wrote:the arm may see a load of 6 kN, for example
Rollin wrote:Good to see you've measured stresses of 6kN and tested your arms to 8kN, makes me feel much better as the guys I've used to machine mine have done theoretical stress tests at 18, 20 and even 60kN in critical directions and the arms have come up shiny.
Rollin wrote:
Dunno about being 'dumbfounded' by the words "Austenite" and "Martensite" either - I think you give the guys on here too little credit. A few minutes of reading on wikipedia gives a good idea of what you're talking about.
EFFalcon wrote:I think thats exactly the type of discussion he was after.
EFFalcon wrote:everyones welcome here, it just comes down to how they portray themselves whilst here.
coming in and saying 'i'm doing something better for half the cost because i'm incredibly awesome' will never go down nicely.
MADXF wrote:Back on topic... Have you fitted them and checked out steering and suspension angles and etc. yet?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users