
http://theage.drive.com.au/motor-news/f ... 19lel.html
Hiboost wrote:.. what u pay for is what u get!!! performance isnt cheep
Hiboost wrote:.. what u pay for is what u get!!! performance isnt cheep
Hiboost wrote:.. what u pay for is what u get!!! performance isnt cheep
sk8n6 wrote:I still can't see it,
AWD with transaxle would mean v6 power at the very least as the straight 6 will run into width issue's.
However if they do go AWD and some ppl are all for this how come AWD Magna's weren't a huge hit.
I for one agree there will always be performance fords around in years to come, i just hope its still based on a traditional falcon rather than stretched Mondeo
Phoenix wrote:What's wrong with an AWD? If it is set up similar (and I know there is a difference in calibre) to an R8 where no more than 30% of power ever reaches the front end. means better cornering without the huge understeer issues that you normally get with AWD.
TUFED6 wrote:I seem to recall a similarly bullshit article coming out of drive last year, containing no facts and quotes out of context. I wouldn't believe a fkn thing they publish. Look at all the dumbcunt responses to the article. Roflchopter.
Hiboost wrote:.. what u pay for is what u get!!! performance isnt cheep
justa6 wrote:didn't holden do an awd monaro? from memory it wasn't a big hit or earth shattering quick. i'm all for rwd,as parfrey said, could you imagine the shit that would break on 400kw awd.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users