Page 2 of 2

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 1:19 pm
by NUT347
I vote bipopular!

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 1:53 pm
by nstg8a
EFFalcon wrote:Can i get a show of hands, i'm for it.
need another QLD mod!


:thumbsup:

LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 1:54 pm
by needfordspeed
Yeah +1 for Bipolar

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 2:00 pm
by iCER
cant believe my nickname hasnt come across this forum at all.

Good to see some of my posts are actually helpful and warranted! :D

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 3:07 pm
by 67rce
+1 bipolar for mod!

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 6:11 pm
by NUT347
needfordspeed wrote:Yeah +1 for Bipolar


No more +1 posts.

Thats your first warning mate.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 6:28 pm
by Commando
Todd the mod. I like.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 6:34 pm
by Sunboost
De-mod Pete to get Bipolar in.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 6:57 pm
by Commando
Pete does a great job off the forums, he just needs the delete button disabled.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 6:59 pm
by holmsy
fair sure ya can create another mod thing and just untick the box that says ya can delete threads :P

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 7:08 pm
by EFFalcon
i could yes, but education is better.
normally 'deleted' threads are simply moved to the moderator area, for later LOLz

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 7:11 pm
by XR_Lightning
whats with all the Pete bashing?? he pretty much single handedly is keeping the club alive outside this forum

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 8:45 pm
by NUT347
I change my vote to either bigtim or malakai.

:lol:

Seriously though, Todd organizes every cruise and organized a mad as skid pan day.

For QLD support on and off the forums Todd is the winner.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 9:23 pm
by Sunboost
XR_Lightning wrote:whats with all the Pete bashing?? he pretty much single handedly is keeping the club alive outside this forum

Pete was given moderating privileges in order to update and maintain posts within the Event Coordination section, and to have access to the private sections for moderators and admin. When he was granted these privileges, it was ONLY for use relates to event coordination, and he even stated that he wouldn't do any general moderation because we were doing a good enough job.

On a number of occasions, Pete has without prompting, permission and without advice or consultation from other moderators, deleted posts, threads and also unbanned members (his friends, some who have had bad transactions leaving other members out of pocket). He has deleted useful information and also incorrectly deleted threads, so they haven't been archived in the relevant invisible sections. When pulled up, he takes ages to respond or does not respond at all.

He has been a self appointed chief of events for a very long time, and he does that well - no argument there. But the upkeep of this forum rests in the hands of the proper moderators and admin; we choose what stays and what goes, and who stays and goes.

It may not seem like we have much of a standard but without the watchful eye of me, Dan, John and Gill this forum would be full of gumby **** and trolls. We have a very loose strategic direction of sorts.

So that's my life story. Typed on iPhone so excuse any poor use of English.

Sunny
CEO

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 9:27 pm
by Sunboost
And Commando

LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 23rd, 2011, 9:46 pm
by wicksy
You go alright sunny I have had no drama by the original mods you **** up you deserve it, grow some balls or go elsewhere, be prepared to cop shit and take it on the chin I have had my fair share of abuse but I couldn't care,

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 24th, 2011, 12:29 am
by Bipolar
Anyone could've seen all this as personal until that post.

I'm happy to be a mod, mainly because now more than ever my time is valuable to me, and I don't want to spend it reading idiotic shit that only a couple of severely wasted stoners would find mildy entertaining. Or people not using the search function. And For Sale threads with little info and no pics etc etc.



I hadn't thought about it until tonight but I've been doing events and merchandise for nearly 5 years, albeit admittedly not consistently and definitely not to the level of what Pete and Beth have been doing.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 24th, 2011, 1:15 am
by misk
Sundeep wrote:Typed on iPhone so excuse any poor use of English.

Sunny
CEO


Sif blame your iphone for your lack of proper use of the English language.
fkn epic type session on the iphone lol, props ****.


umm shouldn't this kind of discussion not be in a thread about low quality/off topic/shitcarnt posts?
how many mods are there anyway?

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 24th, 2011, 9:04 am
by EFFalcon
LOL.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 24th, 2011, 5:15 pm
by Sunboost
LMAO

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 25th, 2011, 1:02 am
by iCER
ROFL

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 25th, 2011, 11:26 am
by Rollin

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 25th, 2011, 12:09 pm
by nstg8a
Rollin wrote:LMFAO


farkn lol, some **** have too much time on their hands...

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 25th, 2011, 4:44 pm
by XR_Lightning
Sundeep wrote:
XR_Lightning wrote:whats with all the Pete bashing?? he pretty much single handedly is keeping the club alive outside this forum

Pete was given moderating privileges in order to update and maintain posts within the Event Coordination section, and to have access to the private sections for moderators and admin. When he was granted these privileges, it was ONLY for use relates to event coordination, and he even stated that he wouldn't do any general moderation because we were doing a good enough job.

On a number of occasions, Pete has without prompting, permission and without advice or consultation from other moderators, deleted posts, threads and also unbanned members (his friends, some who have had bad transactions leaving other members out of pocket). He has deleted useful information and also incorrectly deleted threads, so they haven't been archived in the relevant invisible sections. When pulled up, he takes ages to respond or does not respond at all.

He has been a self appointed chief of events for a very long time, and he does that well - no argument there. But the upkeep of this forum rests in the hands of the proper moderators and admin; we choose what stays and what goes, and who stays and goes.

It may not seem like we have much of a standard but without the watchful eye of me, Dan, John and Gill this forum would be full of gumby **** and trolls. We have a very loose strategic direction of sorts.

So that's my life story. Typed on iPhone so excuse any poor use of English.

Sunny
CEO


yeah fair enough I guess, obviosuly us normal people dont see this sort of stuff going on, I wasnt having a go when I asked that question, just wasnt sure what the go was

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 25th, 2011, 6:21 pm
by [D1SCNT]
Rollin wrote:LMFAO

HAHAHAAHA.... best christmas, ever that shit was hilarious !!!

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: December 27th, 2011, 8:51 pm
by NUT347
So is Todd a mod yet?

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: May 12th, 2012, 10:40 pm
by Au_Stocka
I just joined today but the set up you guys have is shit hot... and the rules are great.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: May 13th, 2012, 1:28 am
by Bipolar
Glad you agree. Anyone that's normal has no problem following them.


Still an entertaining thread.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: October 18th, 2012, 2:33 pm
by SexcEB
If people can't play by the rules,

Then they should be banned or get a warning no doubt about it.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: November 27th, 2016, 11:08 am
by Fairgolf
Good Day all ---and good bye.
What is a DICKHEAD?
Is there no way to speak and write in a civilized manner as an example to others?

Why are there always some people who know all and do not even notice how stupid they are?

I tried to get help for my FAIRMONT NF -- was stopping all the time when it was "feeling" like it.
Problem solved - but not with any help here.

I will now log out and do not come back

I have been in over 70 countries - nowhere so many unqualified "specialists" as in Australia -- New carby installed in Sydney by a "specialist" fuel consumption was up. On the way to Mackay I stopped in every big town at tune up shops. Finally a customer in a shop has a look -and laughed. Choke connection was reversed ..

That is now 30 years ago and the mechanics I have met just do not know about the old FORD EEC Iv EEC V. I bought a book in the USA -$10. all running fine now

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: November 27th, 2016, 11:02 pm
by Commando
Not sure if bot or not. But I'm bored on night shift so I'll bite:

Going by your first post attitude, I think you got part of your username backwards, shouldn't it read Fairflog?

Every big town's tune up shops between Sydney and Mackay would result in hundreds of days of lost time to chase a "reversed choke connection"... Noice job covering 1800kms there. Beyond flooring it to start it how the fuark did you manage to travel that distance with the choke? Your plugs must've loved it :good: :good: :good:

How was a customer allowed to diagnose your vehicle's issue within a workshop? Oh, you've mentioned this happened 30 years ago, when this was probably a thing & everyone sank piss at brew time. Wait... I'll repeat: you mentioned this happened 30 years ago? Thirty. Years. Ago... Sick grudge skillz.

Congrats on your book purchase from the USA, you must be proud of yourself :clapping:

Fair flog.

Re: LOW QUALITY OF POSTS = BANNINGS

PostPosted: November 28th, 2016, 9:12 am
by ClassicAU
dickhead -ˈdɪkhɛd/
noun vulgar slang

a person who is an idiot and shows it all too well

"Stop humping the chair! You're such a dickhead!"