Amon wrote:did u use silicon with the rocker cover gasket?
i did mine up to wat i thought would be ok (tight but not overtight)... didnt know there were torque specifications for the rocker cover...
also i didnt use silicon... seems to be alright tho...
rab wrote:whats the cost supplied and fitted for a lumpy cam from a shop ? nice lumpy idle and good mid range grunt but not to the point it wont idle...if ye know what i mean.. i know damn all about this modification..
Sundeep wrote:I'd prob take the EF because I'd be looking at a dash that was designed by CAD rather than with pencils, t squares and protractors
rab wrote:1673 looks to be the one.. just need to email about fitting as brissy is too far to travel from to vic
Sundeep wrote:I'd prob take the EF because I'd be looking at a dash that was designed by CAD rather than with pencils, t squares and protractors
pHaT`eL wrote:Editing posts never really gets old
I have a tiny tiny penis.
travs ea-xr6 wrote:It looks like you got the engine on TDC because the valve springs look like there open free so it must of been on the power stroke.
If you dont have cyl 1 at TDC you will likely smash the valves in cyl 1.
Sundeep wrote:I'd prob take the EF because I'd be looking at a dash that was designed by CAD rather than with pencils, t squares and protractors
Amon wrote:didnt know there were torque specifications for the rocker cover...
Rhodseyy wrote:Amon wrote:didnt know there were torque specifications for the rocker cover...
There is torque specifications for every single nut and bolt on any car. they are set that way through machines on the production line. how ever not all bolts require to be set to the specific torque setting, only the important ones that make seals etc.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users