EBOOST wrote:I say keep trying yourself.
Wouldn't it be more satisfying doing the 9 yourself?
Surely more runs the better you will get.
EBGLT wrote:UNless someone else drives it!!
iCER wrote:OMY i didnt think a turboed NA will pass rwc without engineers but there you go. (presume we talking about a wagon in your signature)
67rce, lol @ comparing my crappy what...700rwhp to a 1000rwhp supra....thanks
iCER wrote:agreed EBGLT!
Giving it a good crack on the weekend. Goign with a spare set of drive shafts.
I find it hard to belive the current driveshafts/CVs will hold up....especially if i actually lift the front wheels.
4k launches on the way...!
iCER wrote:67rce, clearly i stated many times my cooler pipe blew off 3/4 down the track and i rolled over for a 10.5
tx5, trying again sunday! Again, cant do much with racing only once a fortnight...
67rce wrote:On your 10.5@ 140mph pass, you were .03 sec slower from 660ft to 1320ft than a genuine .9@139mph car. Your cooler pipe DIDNT blow off. You dont have a 9 sec car, and unless you get the 660ft down, you won't have a 9 sec car.
dylby1 wrote:EBGLT wrote:UNless someone else drives it!!
I'd be heaps happier with a 10 I ran myself than a 9 someone else did in my car.
NUT347 wrote:Don't call him "mate" Rollin you fucken traitor.
bentls wrote:NUT347 wrote:Don't call him "mate" Rollin you fucken traitor.
67rce wrote:On your 10.5@ 140mph pass, you were .03 sec slower from 660ft to 1320ft than a genuine .9@139mph car. Your cooler pipe DIDNT blow off. You dont have a 9 sec car, and unless you get the 660ft down, you won't have a 9 sec car.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users