BA XR6T - 480rwkw+ - Currently @ 10.05. 9s knocking in Oct13

by **MAD** » May 21st, 2013, 11:48 am

The other 15% is made up of fluffy kittens and unicorn piss.

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 11:54 am

obviosuly meant 100% unleaded

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 11:54 am

actually, what about running e100???

by **OMY-747** » May 21st, 2013, 11:56 am

My cars modified and it passed a rwc no drama's at all first time in and it is NOT engineered. Where's my percentage?

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 11:59 am

you in vic?

and i dont mean 'rwc' i mean RWC.

by **MAD** » May 21st, 2013, 12:04 pm

iCER wrote:actually, what about running e100???

EFFalcon wrote:
For vehicles built after 1 February 1986,
or originally operating on unleaded
petrol, catalytic converters and
associated emission and engine control
systems of vehicles must remain
operational. (See 5(c) below.)

by **EFFalcon** » May 21st, 2013, 12:12 pm

There are a range of modifications that are allowable under RWC/ADR ... 99% is a fair whack off

if the car came with a cat fitted, it needs to be retained.
the same is in place with straight LPG.

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 12:13 pm

fairy muff. so need a cat no matter what basically

by **NUT347** » May 21st, 2013, 12:15 pm

iCER wrote:wasnt have a go at him as i am sure he has. Just stating the fact for that argument and claims.

say 127mph did actually run a 'low 10', whats another 13mph going to run theoretically? Ask anyone who knows anything about racing. 140mph is a 9 second pass in any car with a proper driver.

The facts are xrcist will never run a 10 as it is, because the setup will never get it there.

MPH means only one thing; you have the power.. It doesn't mean you can run the times! You still to this day think adding power is your fix, you are retarded!

So if xrcist ran 140mph could it run a 9 as is with Craig lowndes driving?

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 12:45 pm

ummm yes?

All im changing is the driver on the weekend (bar stiffer rear shocks i put in)

by **OMY-747** » May 21st, 2013, 1:34 pm

iCER wrote:you in vic?

and i dont mean 'rwc' i mean RWC.

Yeah I'm in vic. No one around here will risk doing a dodgy one with all the new rwc rules with the pics and all that.

by **MAD** » May 21st, 2013, 1:43 pm

How do the 90/10's go on the hwy?

by **67rce** » May 21st, 2013, 2:13 pm

What does iCER's BA and a 1000rwhp supra have in common?

They bot run 140mph but don't get the ET's...

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 2:51 pm

OMY i didnt think a turboed NA will pass rwc without engineers but there you go. (presume we talking about a wagon in your signature)

67rce, lol @ comparing my crappy what...700rwhp to a 1000rwhp supra....thanks

by **EFFalcon** » May 21st, 2013, 2:53 pm : **OMY-747 Likes this post**

His wagon is a LS1 VY SS lol

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 2:56 pm

mad, 90/10s are fine for straights. Bit noisy (rattle) every time you hit a bump (like when you dont have a rear spring in properly). Havnt tried launching hard on the street yet as weather has been balls. See how we go...

by **Ef_frmnt** » May 21st, 2013, 3:19 pm

iCER wrote:ummm yes?

All im changing is the driver on the weekend (bar stiffer rear shocks i put in)

So for your car to be "as driven on the highway" that means Dion will be taking it out and cutting sick laps and flashing the f*cking stupid LED sign and claiming he beat everything that drove above idle?

Oh and spinning shit every day...?

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 3:28 pm

im happy to own a 9 second car. even if i cant get it down the track myself in 9 seconds

Plenty of cars swap drivers.

by **justa6** » May 21st, 2013, 3:53 pm

**** I hope you run a 9 to stop all this bullshit.

by **iCER** » May 21st, 2013, 3:59 pm

deep down i do to.....but then....no more fun ... just me boasting alot more

by **BROCKYB8** » May 21st, 2013, 4:33 pm

iCER wrote:im happy to own a 9 second car. even if i cant get it down the track myself in 9 seconds Plenty of cars swap drivers.

Your a idiot . until it does a 9 second it will never be a 9 second car .
Excuses are all the same when you haven't done the time .

How bout you put dion in the damn car then you can boast all you want that it does 9s .

MPh or no mph you haven't run a 9

by **Mr_4.0** » May 21st, 2013, 4:46 pm

If you convert to LPG you are not required to pass an emissions test as far as I understand. But all other EPA and ADR approvals must be used.

by **private9** » May 21st, 2013, 5:38 pm : **wombi90 Likes this post**

OMY-747 wrote:
iCER wrote:you in vic?

and i dont mean 'rwc' i mean RWC.

Yeah I'm in vic. No one around here will risk doing a dodgy one with all the new rwc rules with the pics and all that.

Lol, you obviously don't hang around enough of us ethnic types

by **NUT347** » May 21st, 2013, 5:52 pm

NUT347 wrote:
iCER wrote:wasnt have a go at him as i am sure he has. Just stating the fact for that argument and claims.

say 127mph did actually run a 'low 10', whats another 13mph going to run theoretically? Ask anyone who knows anything about racing. 140mph is a 9 second pass in any car with a proper driver.

The facts are xrcist will never run a 10 as it is, because the setup will never get it there.

MPH means only one thing; you have the power.. It doesn't mean you can run the times! You still to this day think adding power is your fix, you are retarded!

So if xrcist ran 140mph could it run a 9 as is with Craig lowndes driving?

iCER wrote:ummm yes?

All im changing is the driver on the weekend (bar stiffer rear shocks i put in)

Lol saying yes just proves how much of a muppet you are.

by **SnyperEB** » May 21st, 2013, 5:53 pm

I'm confused!

A dyno car that doesn't produce it's so called numbers on a dyno day?

A 140mph car that runs 10's but its a 9sec car?

And 370rwkw(630hp) doesn't equal 700hp?

This car has me mindfucked!

by **Dumpsta** » May 21st, 2013, 5:54 pm

Lol @ Icer vs. Boostedfalcon thread. It's become quite the chatroom.

As justa6 said, I hope you run a 9 (for the same reason also). You can skite all you want when you do but please please please stop with the personal goals and records. :beg:

Personally I'd be happy with a 10 second car, and I'd tell everyone it only ran high 11's..

blow their mind.

by **Rollin** » May 21st, 2013, 6:33 pm

iCER wrote:im happy to own a 9 second car. even if i cant get it down the track myself in 9 seconds Plenty of cars swap drivers.

Awesome. By that logic, our Suzuki Jimny is now a 9 second car. I can't get it down the quarter myself in 9 seconds, but if I swapped drivers, then it could be a 9 second car.

:scratch:

by **iCER** » May 22nd, 2013, 12:39 am

did it run 140mph?

In racing 140mph is a 9 second pass.

ebglt who has 370? I pulled 446 on the dyno day. As you saw in vids water pissing out of reservoir as head was lifting. Re torqued head bolts and back on the dyno and was back to normal. Hence i went up 4mph the following heathcote session.

icer v everyone

Everyone throws their 2 cents in, i correct them, then they go all quiet and someone else picks up something till i put them in their whole and then another comes...never ending...well till the 9 is run

nut, stick to your never ending ED

by **needfordspeed** » May 22nd, 2013, 12:45 am

You're delusional if you think you've put anyone in their place or corrected anyone!

Btw did the head lift again after those braces that Dynomite made?

by **dylby1** » May 22nd, 2013, 1:07 am : **Dansedgli Likes this post**

iCER wrote:did it run 140mph?

In racing 140mph is a 9 second pass.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but I would've thought that in racing a 9 second pass was a 9 second pass, regardless of MPH.

If 140mph is a 9 second pass, why have you got the 140 but not the 9 seconds. Doesn't add up to me.

by **NUT347** » May 22nd, 2013, 6:20 am

Rolf

Be out on the highway Friday night, ill ram your 9 second monster that cant really do a 9 but has the power to do it but actually can't... With my rental car.

by **SnyperEB** » May 22nd, 2013, 7:04 am

Sorry my bad 470kw is only 630hp not 700hp.

iPhone typo.

by **falcon4life** » May 22nd, 2013, 7:14 am

Need more diesel....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9-3s-j ... ata_player

by **MAD** » May 22nd, 2013, 9:56 am : **dylby1 Likes this post**

dylby1 wrote:Someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but I would've thought that in racing a 9 second pass was a 9 second pass, regardless of MPH.

If 140mph is a 9 second pass, why have you got the 140 but not the 9 seconds. Doesn't add up to me.

You are wrong.
When it runs a 9, it will be an 8sec car.

by **iCER** » May 22nd, 2013, 10:19 am

LOL. What MAD said.

needforspeed, head just needed to be re-torqued after the head was done after 500/1000km. But like a goose i gave the car a hard time as soon as i picked it up

by **SnyperEB** » May 22nd, 2013, 11:11 am

MAD wrote:
dylby1 wrote:Someone correct me if I'm wrong please, but I would've thought that in racing a 9 second pass was a 9 second pass, regardless of MPH.

If 140mph is a 9 second pass, why have you got the 140 but not the 9 seconds. Doesn't add up to me.

You are wrong.
When it runs a 9, it will be an 8sec car.

lol true

by **braad** » May 22nd, 2013, 12:37 pm

iCER wrote:did it run 140mph?

In racing 140mph is a 9 second pass.

ebglt who has 370? I pulled 446 on the dyno day. As you saw in vids water pissing out of reservoir as head was lifting. Re torqued head bolts and back on the dyno and was back to normal. Hence i went up 4mph the following heathcote session.

icer v everyone

Everyone throws their 2 cents in, i correct them, then they go all quiet and someone else picks up something till i put them in their whole and then another comes...never ending...well till the 9 is run

nut, stick to your never ending ED

Hole*

by **iCER** » May 22nd, 2013, 12:44 pm

balls* ?

by **braad** » May 22nd, 2013, 12:55 pm

Vagina*?

by **crusty2** » May 22nd, 2013, 7:48 pm

Mangina ha ha :shock:

Who is online