Commando wrote:Yeah, you'll find non-ABS cars do feel different. Especially at 100kph on a wet road when a roo jumps out in front of you.
ABS = spongy brakes, but you'll slow to about 60
non-ABS = lock up at 100 & skid past the roo doing about 95. But you'll look sick doing it
Steady wrote:BOV = rice.
89AIT wrote:Yep a properly engineered system doesn't need one. Hence why most of us need one.
BI6TIM wrote:I love it how people who don't like BOV's always bring up rally cars![]()
How can our cars and budgets be compared to rally cars, EVER?!
Steady wrote:BI6TIM wrote:I love it how people who don't like BOV's always bring up rally cars![]()
How can our cars and budgets be compared to rally cars, EVER?!
Rally cars are on and off the throttle constantly.
They also can't afford, timewise, to be replacing turbos at the end of every stage.
Why would they choose to make something unreliable in a racing discipline where reliabilty is probably the most important thing?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]