Ef Falcon Xr6 Turbo **Sold new owner boosted to 19psi 480rwk

by **BI6TIM** » August 3rd, 2009, 6:47 am

Jim Mock Motorsport is full of SHIT!!! Always has been, always will be. Posting a dyno sheet will not prove it has 480rwkw.

It would take more than 19psi to make that much and there is only a two or three e-series that have made anywhere near that and all of them were far better engineered than this thing!

by **Mr. CVE** » August 3rd, 2009, 8:17 am

Wow !!
very impressive, talk about stealth !! In the pics you can only see 1 turbo, can't see the other bigger one ( the one you would need to make 480rwkw !)
Still, sounds good !

by **EFFalcon** » August 3rd, 2009, 8:31 am

he'll be full of shit.. or he's spent a lot since buying it

that fuel system won't do 480rwkw.

anyone who knows LPG would know that

by **Steady** » August 3rd, 2009, 8:59 am

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE

by **SnyperEB** » August 3rd, 2009, 9:13 am

BI6TIM wrote:Jim Mock Motorsport is full of SHIT!!! Always has been, always will be. Posting a dyno sheet will not prove it has 480rwkw.

It would take more than 19psi to make that much and there is only a two or three e-series that have made anywhere near that and all of them were far better engineered than this thing!

Spot on!!

Turbo tony's car had 25psi and only made 421rwkw.

by **Malakai** » August 3rd, 2009, 12:44 pm

I'll believe it when me shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

by **BROCKYB8** » August 3rd, 2009, 1:49 pm

SnyperEB wrote:
BI6TIM wrote:Jim Mock Motorsport is full of SHIT!!! Always has been, always will be. Posting a dyno sheet will not prove it has 480rwkw.

It would take more than 19psi to make that much and there is only a two or three e-series that have made anywhere near that and all of them were far better engineered than this thing!

Spot on!!

Turbo tony's car had 25psi and only made 421rwkw.

Well considering that there is like 100,000 at least into turbo tonys car over years i cant see it beating his .

by **krisisdog** » August 3rd, 2009, 2:35 pm

BI6TIM wrote:Jim Mock Motorsport is full of SHIT!!! Always has been, always will be. Posting a dyno sheet will not prove it has 480rwkw.

Cmon I still want to see it!
Like I said to start with, +9psi doesnt equal an extra 200 rwkw!

by **hershwon** » August 3rd, 2009, 4:26 pm

well alot of haters as i have stated i am sceptical my self so i want to see it to believe it also...
and i have been informed that the 240kw i made at 10 psi there was a sizable blockage in the front mount so the 240 at 10 was most probably more

by **SnyperEB** » August 3rd, 2009, 4:28 pm

What was in the cooler?

by **t1MMy** » August 3rd, 2009, 4:30 pm

SnyperEB wrote:What was in the cooler?

A small child.

by **Malakai** » August 3rd, 2009, 4:38 pm

Motsons... LOL

by **NUT347** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:05 pm

lolllllll

by **Revengelane** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:20 pm

Malakai wrote:Motsons... LOL

Why LOL at Motsons????? The Performance Centre did the tune, LOOK AT THE DYNO SHEET!!!!!!! Mark only sorted out the gas system problem/s he was having.

by **Revengelane** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:21 pm

NUT347 wrote:lolllllll

What the fark are you LOL at you get your cars tuned at Chipdick

by **NUT347** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:28 pm

Revengelane wrote:
NUT347 wrote:lolllllll

What the fark are you LOL at you get your cars tuned at Chipdick

lol fuckwit i was LOL at the 480rwk at 19psi

and i bet chiptorque know more about tuning then someone that raves on about "how it delivers".... dick.

by **krisisdog** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:33 pm

I dont get the LOL at Motsons either.... JMM are claiming the 480rwkw.
Motsons installed and tuned a new gas system on our F truck - the new system and tune picked up like 50rwhp....

by **Revengelane** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:39 pm

NUT347 wrote:
Revengelane wrote:
NUT347 wrote:lolllllll

What the fark are you LOL at you get your cars tuned at Chipdick

lol fuckwit i was LOL at the 480rwk at 19psi

and i bet chiptorque know more about tuning then someone that raves on about "how it delivers".... dick.

Right.........right anyway I thought you were lol at Brett's post, farkyou too fuckwit

by **Malakai** » August 3rd, 2009, 5:53 pm

I love shit stirring on this forum, will stir again!

by **NUT347** » August 3rd, 2009, 6:01 pm

FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WORRIED, I AM NOW "LOL" AT BRETTS POST ABOVE AND ONLY THAT POST:

LOL!

by **Steady** » August 3rd, 2009, 6:08 pm

How much did power did Brendans white EF make again?
And ahhh what has the red EB run?
Obviously JMM don't know what they are doing :lol:

by **SnyperEB** » August 3rd, 2009, 6:26 pm

The Red EB is impressive!!

by **Malakai** » August 4th, 2009, 9:56 am

They don't do bad work, their product and services are good and they have built a good name for themselves which gets them customers with cash. I give kudos to them in a business sense. However their dyno is known for reading high which sullies their cred a bit. Plus anyone with half decent knowledge about E-Series Falcons would never fork out $7000 for 170kw so in places like this forum they get hated on. Which is and isn't justified but that's the way it is.

I love their red EB too it is a sick E-Series drag car.

by **Steady** » August 4th, 2009, 10:11 am

You know whats great about this?
We can all agree that the JMM dyno spits out figures that are higher then modern dynos (everyone does remember it's ancient right?).
There are no fights, no flaming, no stooges leaping to the defence of their favoured workshop/backyard tuner.
I think it says alot for this forum that we can say that about any workshop/backyard tuner that we like, and because we aren't tied to any of them, there is no bitching up.
Just brings a tear to my eye thats all, good stuff guys :thumbsup:

by **Malakai** » August 4th, 2009, 10:19 am

I agree completely.

by **hershwon** » August 4th, 2009, 5:13 pm

motsons know their shit about GRA only one fella anyway!!!

the 240kw was before the system was upgraded and went harder from the get go... I did the tuning just used a local dyno as i did the research necesary to be able to tune it all by myself i have no i dea what JMM did as its 2 states away and just thought id post up what this fella from vic told me!!!

even on this that all of u know the dyno reads high i dare say it wouldnt be more than 80kw higher thats rediculous and if so the car i built (for the most part) pulled 400rwkw with nothing but boost

Makes me fukin happy chappy!!

by **Steady** » August 4th, 2009, 5:24 pm

it could be more then 80kw higher then a modern dyno, yes.
this is a dyno from the days before they were computer controlled.
you cannot compare it's results.
what you should do is ask the bloke who bought it what it made on mocks dyno before they did whatever they did, ie. it made 240rwkw on whatever dyno you ran it on, what did it make on the mock dyno with the same setup...

by **needfordspeed** » August 4th, 2009, 7:28 pm

Steady wrote:You know whats great about this?
We can all agree that the JMM dyno spits out figures that are higher then modern dynos (everyone does remember it's ancient right?).
There are no fights, no flaming, no stooges leaping to the defence of their favoured workshop/backyard tuner.
I think it says alot for this forum that we can say that about any workshop/backyard tuner that we like, and because we aren't tied to any of them, there is no bitching up.
Just brings a tear to my eye thats all, good stuff guys

I can mention a certain workshop that'll get lots of memebers on here bitching up

by **Sunboost** » August 4th, 2009, 11:04 pm

by **Steady** » August 5th, 2009, 6:35 am

needfordspeed wrote:
Steady wrote:You know whats great about this?
We can all agree that the JMM dyno spits out figures that are higher then modern dynos (everyone does remember it's ancient right?).
There are no fights, no flaming, no stooges leaping to the defence of their favoured workshop/backyard tuner.
I think it says alot for this forum that we can say that about any workshop/backyard tuner that we like, and because we aren't tied to any of them, there is no bitching up.
Just brings a tear to my eye thats all, good stuff guys

I can mention a certain workshop that'll get lots of memebers on here bitching up

between the lines you have read, hmmm

by **EFFalcon** » August 5th, 2009, 8:01 am

I'd just like to know how a car can do 400+rwkw on a single 3/8 LPG line.

by **Commando** » August 5th, 2009, 8:39 am

Malakai wrote:I'll believe it when me shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

Shenanigans

by **SnyperEB** » August 5th, 2009, 9:30 am

EFFalcon wrote:I'd just like to know how a car can do 400+rwkw on a single 3/8 LPG line.

John you would be looking at 650rwkw?

by **OMY-747** » August 7th, 2009, 9:55 am

EFFalcon wrote:I'd just like to know how a car can do 400+rwkw on a single 3/8 LPG line.

thats an easy answer, to be put simple, it cant :amen:

by **BROCKYB8** » August 7th, 2009, 10:30 am

SImple as it is if there is not pics or video of it . it just didnt happen .

Ive seen 3 cars do a dyno run on mock and then do other dyno straight away and all have had a fair difference.
A ef with there full kit did 184 then on dynomotive then 159.
A ba xr6 ute. 167 on there and 151 on g and d
My ea got 182 on theres and 161 on hallam.

Its not like they have a certian percentage that are up
but they are up.

And for those three others that i have mention they generallly are all around the same. i think the most ive had difference with back to back is 2rwkw

by **Nikk O'lass** » August 7th, 2009, 9:15 pm

I'll reserve judgment until i see the dyno readout.

by **krisisdog** » August 7th, 2009, 9:20 pm

How long can you hold your reservation?

by **BROCKYB8** » August 7th, 2009, 9:33 pm

COULD BE a long time

by **BROCKYB8** » August 7th, 2009, 9:33 pm

COULD BE a long time

by **Hiboost** » August 7th, 2009, 9:39 pm

"T3/4 Turbo 600hp rated" thats a Massive turbo, no way this car made 480rwk with that Massive turbo...
the highest dyno reading i have seen was out by 50 rwk

Who is online