
would need to get creative with sump/oil pickup unless u went the later model motor.
Rollin wrote:Brad - as was mentioned several pages ago flipping the rod end will make the problem atrocious and result in bump steer issues that could be seen from space. The rod end needs to come in from the bottom, but it needs to come in from the bottom about 30mm lower down than it currently does.
nstg8a wrote:lol, im thinking teabagging has a different meaning here in oz compared to nz? cos thats the last thing id be thinking of doing to someone that sideswiped my car...
If there is room to make something like that, and can be done at a reasonable cost, I think it would be a good solution.tx5_brent wrote:Just an idea,
This page of this build thread shows a pretty dodgey way of correcting the location of the pivot point, I personally dont know if I would trust it and I doubt the authorities would like it. The next page shows a simple method for jigging up a controll arm.
http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=332026&page=22
Chargd wrote:dont worry mate, it isnt your fault your mum and dad share the same parents.
obsezd wrote:Never knew they allowed grandparents to keep dynos at the retirement village
Bipolar wrote:Basically I park assuming everyone else is retarded.
That's been suggested already, and it is the opposite of what needs to happen.highkid wrote:Just an input ... dont know if it will help ... i noticed not long ago that the ba rtv's i think mounted the tie rod end ontop due to the height of the vehicle but cannot remember the overall height of stub axle assembly ... may help ... if it has not been said already.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users