EFFalcon wrote:mgiht be time to do something about that corner.
EFFalcon wrote:mgiht be time to do something about that corner.
nommic wrote:There was mention that the car may have clipped the inside of the corner, which would have sent it almost head-on into the outer wall. Imagine a head-on at 200+km/h into an immovable object
FOR.0EL on the subject of sex with virgins wrote: i would rather wake up from a dream of a chick licking my nuts, and its actually my cat
FOR.0EL on the subject of sex with virgins wrote: i would rather wake up from a dream of a chick licking my nuts, and its actually my cat
Fairmont888 wrote:its like what some of the V8 main series drivers said, the V8 development series cars are just shithouse compared to the main V8's, they just dont have the same level of safety which then gives more value to dick johnsons comments that maybe the development series shouldnt race at Adelaide because they are mostly the learners of the sport and that corner is too challenging or some crap. At least if Adelaide go back to the old F1 Circuit which could be happening for next year due to popularity then that corner wont be there anymore. it certainly wasnt the hardest hit going into that corner, cars have rolled there before after hitting that wall
Gunns wrote:All the development series car are ALL ex-v8supercars, so how can the safety be any different? They have the same roll cage, the same seat, the same hans device, the same harness, so what is diffrent in the safety level in the cars?
Yes the F1 circuit would be a lot better in terms of safety, but lets on forget Mika Hakkenin spent 4 months in Adelaide hospital and had to learn to walk again after smaking the tires at 200km/h
FOR.0EL on the subject of sex with virgins wrote: i would rather wake up from a dream of a chick licking my nuts, and its actually my cat
Users browsing this forum: No registered users