CHARGED or TURBO...?

This is a general discussion forum, open to all participants

CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 10:59 am

So after askin Johnny last night how many engines hes been thru since he turbo'd his EF he tells me 3. :o
I want to eventually turbo mine, minus the 3 blown engines. Do I need to do any MAJOR work to the motor b4 I strap a turbo to it?...It's a EF2 XR6. Done over 200,000. Any suggestions as to what should be done so I dont have the head trauma after its turbo'd?
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Dansedgli » July 2nd, 2008, 11:00 am

Dont skimp on fuel management and tuning and she'll be right.
User avatar
Dansedgli
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 9734
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:35 am
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 75 times
Been Liked: 542 times

2001 Ford Falcon Ute

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Commando » July 2nd, 2008, 11:19 am

Try to get a "kit" if possible, rather than buying a turbo from here, a manifold from there, etc etc.

Avoid ebay cheap turbos
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 11:22 am

What do you think of Jim Mock's work? Are they over rated?
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Gunns » July 2nd, 2008, 11:48 am

t1MMy wrote:What do you think of Jim Mock's work? Are they over rated?


Great work but you have to be Bill Gates to afford it
you're not an alcoholic til you're drinking nail polish and listerine that you shoplifted!
Image
User avatar
Gunns
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1827
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:52 pm
Location: On top of your mum
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 3 times

1989 Ford SVO

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby AaronEF8 » July 2nd, 2008, 12:54 pm

Do you mean EFFaclon John? Wern't there problems with the motors before they went into the car?
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...
AaronEF8
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2675
Joined: July 20th, 2007, 11:40 pm
Location: Melbourne East
Has Liked: 55 times
Been Liked: 245 times

1997 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 1:02 pm

.
Last edited by t1MMy on June 27th, 2012, 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Dansedgli » July 2nd, 2008, 1:08 pm

Put a BA motor in it then!! Its easy imo. People on here OD because 1 slow tuner couldnt do his job on my car.
User avatar
Dansedgli
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 9734
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:35 am
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 75 times
Been Liked: 542 times

2001 Ford Falcon Ute

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby AaronEF8 » July 2nd, 2008, 1:33 pm

If you go for an AU motor and not a BA motor, you may as well turbo the current motor, and build another motor in the mean time. When the EL motor dies, replace and take skidpics.

Back to the opening topic for a sec, whether you turbo or supercharge it, boost = boost, the motor will handle each one the same.

Whats the go with the BA cams? A Ford workshop manual made for Ultra-Tune I read ages ago said the cams just use a 32-1 tooth (or similar) sensor for cam angle, and if the VCT controller is unplugged, the cams just sit in their usual position. Does that sound accurate at all?

MS2 can run CoP and dual VCT. mmmm adjustable LSA...
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...
AaronEF8
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2675
Joined: July 20th, 2007, 11:40 pm
Location: Melbourne East
Has Liked: 55 times
Been Liked: 245 times

1997 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Dansedgli » July 2nd, 2008, 1:37 pm

Nah the cams run a 3+1 trigger setup. The crank wheel is 36-1.

When disconnected they either lock in 1 positon - Fully advanced or retarded, I cant remember. Or they contintually move due to oil pressure - What the guy who worked on my car said.

After reading the manual I reckon its the first option.
User avatar
Dansedgli
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 9734
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:35 am
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 75 times
Been Liked: 542 times

2001 Ford Falcon Ute

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby AaronEF8 » July 2nd, 2008, 1:49 pm

Ah yeah that rings a bell actually. I'd imagine the cams would have to lock in somewhere safe as a LHM.
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...
AaronEF8
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2675
Joined: July 20th, 2007, 11:40 pm
Location: Melbourne East
Has Liked: 55 times
Been Liked: 245 times

1997 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Malakai » July 2nd, 2008, 2:44 pm

Just get a good full turbo kit, a decent computer and related fuel system, exhaust, a stronger drive-line, some minor internal motor upgrades and you'll be laughing.
FG G6E Turbo MkII - Nizpro Stage 3 - 364 rwkW - 11.63 sec @ 118 mp/h | I like the dark, I love the dark, but I hate nature. Image
User avatar
Malakai
Double Clutching
 
Posts: 5251
Joined: July 21st, 2007, 1:23 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 32 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 2:49 pm

89AIT wrote:Just get a good full turbo kit, a decent computer and related fuel system, exhaust, a stronger drive-line, some minor internal motor upgrades and you'll be laughing.


Thanx mate. As u would be aware a car that has done over 200,000 would hate it if I put a turbo on it and no engine work.
Ive been told new pistons & rings, a mild cam and valve springs.....aswell as the tappets, but they r a given.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Malakai » July 2nd, 2008, 2:57 pm

It would work on a 200k motor but a freshen up would be a good idea. You are correct.
FG G6E Turbo MkII - Nizpro Stage 3 - 364 rwkW - 11.63 sec @ 118 mp/h | I like the dark, I love the dark, but I hate nature. Image
User avatar
Malakai
Double Clutching
 
Posts: 5251
Joined: July 21st, 2007, 1:23 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 32 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Dansedgli » July 2nd, 2008, 3:01 pm

My old EB was fine with 200rwkw for 6 months when it had 300,000kms. Then the rings went.
User avatar
Dansedgli
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 9734
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:35 am
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 75 times
Been Liked: 542 times

2001 Ford Falcon Ute

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Commando » July 2nd, 2008, 3:03 pm

new pistons & rings? only if the engine's stuffed/you're having a high PSI setup happening. or if you just want to be on the really really safe side.
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 3:12 pm

Well it blows a small bit of weed when I sink the foot into it now. It was using a bit of oil so i checked the cam cover gasket and sure enough it was cactus. So ive changed that, and done a oil and filter change, pressure runs normal bit still using more oil that it should, the tappet noise is there, but not bad. What else could it be apart from the rings??
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby AaronEF8 » July 2nd, 2008, 3:17 pm

Keep that motor then, engines that produce weed are pretty rare! You could make a mint.
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...
AaronEF8
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2675
Joined: July 20th, 2007, 11:40 pm
Location: Melbourne East
Has Liked: 55 times
Been Liked: 245 times

1997 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 3:19 pm

LOL smart ass :lol:
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby Commando » July 2nd, 2008, 3:20 pm

Hrm... you may be right with the blowby... Topping up your 4.0 with cheap oil beats sinking $$$ into a rebuild though :P Then again just getting a fresh(er) replacement motor may be a cheap(er) option!

Back to the opening topic for a sec, whether you turbo or supercharge it, boost = boost, the motor will handle each one the same.


Load vs RPMs if we're talking turbo vs centrifugal blower



Another important thing to consider would be your drivetrain. If you go T5 manual, it will be a pretty nervous gearbox... If you go BTR get a cooler for it & a shift kit (pref mechanical shift kit), and you'll be laughing.
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 3:25 pm

Ive just removed the old trans and put a T5 in it. Yes I realise they arent the strongest, but its better than the sloppy 200K auto. Drives much better now!!. Maybee ill just stick to doing a basic rebuild eg: valve stem seals, Valve springs and tappets as well as a mild cam.
It goes in for a full re-spray in a few weeks.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby EFFalcon » July 2nd, 2008, 7:15 pm

Engine 1 went due to bad oil pressure after a 'heated' run up arthurs seat.
bad oil pressure = damaged bearing, problem would have occured if the motor was turbo'd or N/A.

drove it for a few months with a knock in the bottom end, only changed it coz the noise got annoying.

2nd motor was a cheapie, $300 with all accessories and manifold, had a known hard life but i needed a motor quick smart.
it blew lots of smoke on the first drive so completely unrelated to turbo.
engine was in the car for 1 year, did Drags, Skidpan, Track day and ended up changing because people following couldn't breathe when i booted it.

Engine 3 is in the car now, blows smoke on cold start, again was doing this on first drive, not turbo related.

i'd turbo ur current motor, my issues have been completely unrelated to the turbo hence why i just chuck cheapies back in it.
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 8:26 pm

..
Last edited by t1MMy on June 27th, 2012, 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby EFFalcon » July 2nd, 2008, 8:32 pm

don't rebuild it!
turbo it first, iron out the bugs on a average motor, run like 6psi, then build it proper once you know everything else is upto scratch.
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 8:39 pm

LOL I wanna iron out the bugs b4 I turbo it.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby private9 » July 2nd, 2008, 8:42 pm

t1MMy wrote:LOL I wanna iron out the bugs b4 I turbo it.

A low boost turbo setup aint gonna kill your motor! Check out how many people on here are running turbo setups on standard internals. As long as it's tuned right, you'll have no issues.
Image
User avatar
private9
Hitting N2O
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: August 13th, 2007, 7:58 pm
Location: Not in the diner Alf, not in the diner...
Has Liked: 4 times
Been Liked: 185 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby BLKPHN » July 2nd, 2008, 8:44 pm

private9 wrote:
t1MMy wrote:LOL I wanna iron out the bugs b4 I turbo it.

A low boost turbo setup aint gonna kill your motor! Check out how many people on here are running turbo setups on standard internals. As long as it's tuned right, you'll have no issues.



amen to that.... and its great to see mine is still kicking after 2 years.....
Strive for perfection in everything we do. Take the best that exists and make it better.
When it does not exist, design it. Accept nothing nearly right or good enough.


Image
User avatar
BLKPHN
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1363
Joined: August 15th, 2007, 6:17 pm
Has Liked: 7 times
Been Liked: 33 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby private9 » July 2nd, 2008, 8:49 pm

BLKPHN wrote:amen to that.... and its great to see mine is still kicking after 2 years.....
And ALOT of fun!
Image
User avatar
private9
Hitting N2O
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: August 13th, 2007, 7:58 pm
Location: Not in the diner Alf, not in the diner...
Has Liked: 4 times
Been Liked: 185 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 8:57 pm

OK. maybee I worry too much because of the noisy tappets. I gotta get that issue sorted soon. Not very noisy, but I can hear them and they piss me off.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby private9 » July 2nd, 2008, 9:01 pm

t1MMy wrote:OK. maybee I worry too much because of the noisy tappets. I gotta get that issue sorted soon. Not very noisy, but I can hear them and they piss me off.

Change your oil! Failing that, recondition the engine properly with a bottle of Stop Smoke and Lifter Free up. A full reco like that will cost $20 :D
Image
User avatar
private9
Hitting N2O
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: August 13th, 2007, 7:58 pm
Location: Not in the diner Alf, not in the diner...
Has Liked: 4 times
Been Liked: 185 times

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby t1MMy » July 2nd, 2008, 9:04 pm

I changed the oil last week, as well as a new R/C gasket and oil filter. AND....i ran a lifter free-up oil thru it too.
Its the tappets.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: CHARGED or TURBO...?

Postby ed40 » July 2nd, 2008, 9:08 pm

Dansedgli wrote:My old EB was fine with 200rwkw for 6 months when it had 300,000kms. Then the rings went.

sounds exactly like mine.
haha
rings FTL
Rollin wrote:At least I can deal with it while driving my boyfriend around in my car each weekend
User avatar
ed40
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 8:39 pm
Location: Perth, WA
Has Liked: 191 times
Been Liked: 137 times

1994 Ford Falcon


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]