MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

This is a general discussion forum, open to all participants

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:23 pm

holmsy wrote:
holmsy wrote:
holmsy wrote:im still yet to see an exact story of what has happened or anything.
try explaining what happened to your "mates"
instead of avoiding saying anything factual and still ignoring any facts.


still ignoring ey



Nope i asked the question above about a silver VR
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby holmsy » June 4th, 2009, 7:24 pm

instead of giving info. so yeh your still not saying shit
Project: SLOXR8: 1994 EF XR8, mech shift kit, 3500 histall, Lokka, 36lb injectors, AU 185 motor, Cranecam 444225, crane roller rockers, crow valve springs, Pacies, 3" exhaust, hiflo cats. twin 044's, vortech v2,microtech tuned by daltons (290.3rwkw @11psi) at DALTONS
Image
User avatar
holmsy
Shooting Flames
 
Posts: 6473
Joined: August 2nd, 2007, 11:07 pm
Location: Geelong
Has Liked: 182 times
Been Liked: 154 times

1994 Ford XR8

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Rollin » June 4th, 2009, 7:25 pm

oneredED wrote:Slightly offtopic Hiboost, but what is your affiliation with RAJAB racing? Is this like a Casper/JMM, BIGTIM/Snort, Rollin/Lokka, type deal? I'm just curious as to why you'd have the free plug in your signature?


Just for the record, I have recieved absolutely nothing from having my car in the ads for 4wd systems. Absolutely fucking nothing.

I'm quite pissed about it because I'm fairly sure I put about 7k cashflow through their doors as a result of my infactuation with lokkas, and all they've done is use pics of my car in their ads. I've not even had an email asking if it was ok.

67rce wrote:Having watched your 10.7 clip, i don't rate a car that sits on the line for 5-10seconds spooling as a true 10 second car, as it has been said, different Dyno's give different figures, hell rollin made 430rwhp at hi power and 370rwhp at fat pipes on the same tune...


430 to 370 even after fitting a 60mm gate and modifying the exhaust to greatly improve flow no less.


As an aside and slightly more on topic I'm of the opinion that dyno temp sensors SHOULD be left hanging on the wall.

I had previously thought that sitting them in the engine bay was the way to go, but I have revised my thoughts on this.

If a car has a busted ass intake setup (like mine/most turbo cars) and the pod sucks bullshit hot air from directly behind the radiator, it will have less power than an identical car with a proper cold air intake.

In theory, if you dynoed that car with the two different intake setups and the intake sensor positioned to read actual intake temp, the one with the shit intake will read higher, even though it is actually making LESS power on the street/track!

Intake air temp should be the same as ambient temp, and none of this compensating for crap intake setup shit.
Last edited by Rollin on June 4th, 2009, 7:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image

Look at your car. Now back to mine. Now back to yours. Now back to mine. Sadly, yours isn't mine. But if you stopped buying dodgy cars and bought an ED, yours could be like mine. Look down. Back up. Where are you? ...You're on BoostedFalcon, reading the signature your signature could be like! Anything is possible when your car looks like my car... I'm on a computer.
User avatar
Rollin
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: July 15th, 2007, 4:35 pm
Location: Brisbane - Driving around in a metal and glass case of emotion!
Has Liked: 327 times
Been Liked: 751 times

1994 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:25 pm

holmsy wrote:im still yet to see an exact story of what has happened or anything.
try explaining what happened to your "mates"
instead of avoiding saying anything factual and still ignoring any facts.

still ignoring ey?


Hiboost wrote:MR.CVE what happend with the silver vr u tuned? ya remember?
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby t1MMy » June 4th, 2009, 7:25 pm

Hiboost wrote:
Commando wrote:
somewhere on page 5 wrote:i ant representing anyone but me. i get my car tuned der thats all...THIS IS NOT A WORKSHOP WAR!!!!!


a bit further down on page 5 wrote:i tuned my own car, ive done mates cars, no i havent meet the BLOKE, my mates have...oh and how many engines have i BLOWN UP?0


hmmmmmm...



Hmmmmmmm bout what?

It's called contradiction mate. That's what he's pointing out.

con·tra·dic·tion Listen to the pronunciation of contradiction
Pronunciation:
\ˌkän-trə-ˈdik-shən\
Function:
noun
Date:
14th century

1: act or an instance of contradicting2 a: a proposition, statement, or phrase that asserts or implies both the truth and falsity of something b: a statement or phrase whose parts contradict each other <a round square is a contradiction in terms>3 a: logical incongruity b: a situation in which inherent factors, actions, or propositions are inconsistent or contrary to one another
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Commando » June 4th, 2009, 7:26 pm

Hiboost wrote:
Commando wrote:
somewhere on page 5 wrote:i ant representing anyone but me. i get my car tuned der thats all...THIS IS NOT A WORKSHOP WAR!!!!!


a bit further down on page 5 wrote:i tuned my own car, ive done mates cars, no i havent meet the BLOKE, my mates have...oh and how many engines have i BLOWN UP?0


hmmmmmm...



Hmmmmmmm bout what?


SO do you tune IT yourself, or DO you GET your CAR tuned at Rajab?
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 7:26 pm

basilisk211 wrote:hiboost

knowledgable chap.

just won't answer direct questions.

shame.

would add to his credibility.

i think.

you know what is a big credibility killer?
anonymity.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:27 pm

holmsy wrote:instead of giving info. so yeh your still not saying shit



ill let MR.CVE talk bout it.
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:29 pm

Commando wrote:
SO do you tune IT yourself, or DO you GET your CAR tuned at Rajab?


the 10.7 was tuned BY ALAN RAJAB (MOTEC) the 11.2 tune (ADAPTRONIC) was done by me..
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby basilisk211 » June 4th, 2009, 7:30 pm

Hiboost wrote:
holmsy wrote:instead of giving info. so yeh your still not saying shit



ill let MR.CVE talk bout it.


innuendos are usually made by people who are not sure of their facts. usually when they are working off heresay.
basilisk211
Cranking Over
 
Posts: 9
Joined: June 4th, 2009, 5:33 pm
Location: planet earth
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 0 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 7:31 pm

basilisk211 wrote:
Hiboost wrote:
holmsy wrote:instead of giving info. so yeh your still not saying shit



ill let MR.CVE talk bout it.


innuendos are usually made by people who are not sure of their facts. usually when they are working off heresay.

and people who make anonymous attacks are usually cowards.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Commando » June 4th, 2009, 7:31 pm

Steady wrote:
basilisk211 wrote:hiboost

knowledgable chap.

just won't answer direct questions.

shame.

would add to his credibility.

i think.

you know what is a big credibility killer?
anonymity.


Steady he's an existing member, posting under a different IP to remain anonymous. I'm tipping there won't be any build threads or introduction threads or any other kind of activity from this guy, beyond this thread or future threads involving CVE/HiBoost
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby oneredED » June 4th, 2009, 7:32 pm

Are you shitting me Dan? That's fuckingbullshit :shock:

EDIT: thread too fast, I was referring to Rollin and the Lokka bullshit.
Last edited by oneredED on June 4th, 2009, 7:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
2013 VW Up!
2014 KTM 250SX-F
AUIII Ute
User avatar
oneredED
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1688
Joined: July 16th, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: Horsham
Has Liked: 15 times
Been Liked: 30 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby boostedbb » June 4th, 2009, 7:32 pm

im trying to understand how you keep saying were not having WORKSHOP WARS but you go off topic to a problem occuring with a vr he tuned which sounds like a workshop problem not a fualty dyno reading?
"YLDRDE" ef falcon au 4.0l, 5spd, t04 turbo, lsd, gt bodykit,venom front,42lb injectors,044 pump, surge tank,leather interior, and all taken off and put back to std for a rwc :-(

work hack: ef falcon, fairmont seats, superlows, 2.5"exhaust fmic walbro pump vortech fmu t04 turbo

Image

YLDRDE BUILD THREAD
http://www.eseries.com.au/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9114&sid=e4aa0e2379438580e9376b2c3ac1afe4
User avatar
boostedbb
Spooling Up
 
Posts: 771
Joined: March 14th, 2009, 2:13 pm
Location: sitting at my computer, mildura
Has Liked: 31 times
Been Liked: 22 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 7:33 pm

i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 7:34 pm

Commando wrote:
Steady wrote:
basilisk211 wrote:hiboost

knowledgable chap.

just won't answer direct questions.

shame.

would add to his credibility.

i think.

you know what is a big credibility killer?
anonymity.


Steady he's an existing member, posting under a different IP to remain anonymous. I'm tipping there won't be any build threads or introduction threads or any other kind of activity from this guy, beyond this thread or future threads involving CVE/HiBoost


so see below basically?

Steady wrote:and people who make anonymous attacks are usually cowards.


EFFalcon wrote:i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.

thats a long bow to draw John!
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby boostedbb » June 4th, 2009, 7:35 pm

i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.


looks that way doesn't it
"YLDRDE" ef falcon au 4.0l, 5spd, t04 turbo, lsd, gt bodykit,venom front,42lb injectors,044 pump, surge tank,leather interior, and all taken off and put back to std for a rwc :-(

work hack: ef falcon, fairmont seats, superlows, 2.5"exhaust fmic walbro pump vortech fmu t04 turbo

Image

YLDRDE BUILD THREAD
http://www.eseries.com.au/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9114&sid=e4aa0e2379438580e9376b2c3ac1afe4
User avatar
boostedbb
Spooling Up
 
Posts: 771
Joined: March 14th, 2009, 2:13 pm
Location: sitting at my computer, mildura
Has Liked: 31 times
Been Liked: 22 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:35 pm

EFFalcon wrote:i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.



john i never did have this intention from the start, i was only asking shaun the rwk vs the MPH ... and its twisted and turned it to this...
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby basilisk211 » June 4th, 2009, 7:36 pm

Commando wrote:Steady he's an existing member, posting under a different IP to remain anonymous. I'm tipping there won't be any build threads or introduction threads or any other kind of activity from this guy, beyond this thread or future threads involving CVE/HiBoost


me? just browsing, interesting thread, joined, now asking a few questions. would just like to see an answer or two. just curious. :)
basilisk211
Cranking Over
 
Posts: 9
Joined: June 4th, 2009, 5:33 pm
Location: planet earth
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 0 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 7:39 pm

Hiboost wrote:
EFFalcon wrote:i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.



john i never did have this intention from the start, i was only asking shaun the rwk vs the MPH ... and its twisted and turned it to this...


fair enough, but when did it become neccesary to try and discredit Paul?
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MR.CVE u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby skidder » June 4th, 2009, 7:40 pm

Hiboost wrote:
Thanatos wrote:
Hiboost wrote:ill say this again, if u take off from the start line and have wheel spin till haf the track i guess u are already doing some MPH, then at half track u get traction and u then have 200m left... so u are not starting from 0MPH from half a track


Yes, but you sure as hell won't be doing the same speed at half track as you would be if you were accelerating constantly with no wheelspin, would you?


mate u dont get it ill just give up on u....ull understand one day when u race ...


If the point of your car is to race then why the emphasis on peak power? All peak power is good for is penis extension and winning dyno comps; unless you are going to the salt flats I suppose.
skidder
Idling
 
Posts: 125
Joined: May 26th, 2009, 3:55 pm
Location: Westside, Brisbane.
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:42 pm

EFFalcon wrote:
Hiboost wrote:
EFFalcon wrote:i find it funny how this started as shauns car rwkw vs mph.
then innacurate dyno numbers
then personal attacks directly towards Mr CVE
and now trying to destroy his credibility.

i can't help but think you had this intention from the start.



john i never did have this intention from the start, i was only asking shaun the rwk vs the MPH ... and its twisted and turned it to this...


fair enough, but when did it become neccesary to try and discredit Paul?


john if i really did want to discredit paul i would of... this is me just asking questions ..
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 7:45 pm

Hiboost wrote:what do u mean laggy how many people have the SNORT manifold on? a LOT and i had the SNORT one and LAG was never a PROBLEM, I also had a 1.5mm +two head gaskets and didnt notice anylag turbo spooled up at 2200RPM


surely you know its not just the manifold that effects how laggy it is.
2 points worth noting straight away, you're running a ball bearing turbo
you've also got a proper tune.

Shaun's car is running plain bearing'
shaun is also running stock ECU... with timing turned back a little
so offboost isnt as responsive, which also means more lag
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 7:46 pm

Hiboost wrote:john if i really did want to discredit paul i would of... this is me just asking questions ..


so why keep bringing up the commodore (which i know the story of).
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 7:47 pm

basilisk211 wrote:
Commando wrote:Steady he's an existing member, posting under a different IP to remain anonymous. I'm tipping there won't be any build threads or introduction threads or any other kind of activity from this guy, beyond this thread or future threads involving CVE/HiBoost


me? just browsing, interesting thread, joined, now asking a few questions. would just like to see an answer or two. just curious. :)

neck up, snake.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby krisisdog » June 4th, 2009, 7:48 pm

Hiboost wrote:john if i really did want to discredit paul i would of... this is me just asking questions ..


Fucking do it then!
Stop saying shit and not following it up FFS!
Its fucking annoying reading all your posts dancing around the fucking topic like a nancy. You started this shit and have proved absolutely nothing!
>>> EF Futura Turbo <<<
Now rolling in a tuned turbo Forester as a daily
User avatar
krisisdog
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4115
Joined: August 1st, 2007, 10:03 pm
Location: Grafton
Has Liked: 17 times
Been Liked: 56 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:48 pm

EFFalcon wrote:
Hiboost wrote:what do u mean laggy how many people have the SNORT manifold on? a LOT and i had the SNORT one and LAG was never a PROBLEM, I also had a 1.5mm +two head gaskets and didnt notice anylag turbo spooled up at 2200RPM


surely you know its not just the manifold that effects how laggy it is.
2 points worth noting straight away, you're running a ball bearing turbo
you've also got a proper tune.

Shaun's car is running plain bearing'
shaun is also running stock ECU... with timing turned back a little
so offboost isnt as responsive, which also means more lag



ive had a std ecu, plain bearing turbo, my timing was turned back alot. i did 179rwk and did 105MPH +13.3 sec i never noticed any lag...oh plus a 1.5mm decomp plate and two head gaskets on top.
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby skidder » June 4th, 2009, 7:54 pm

Hiboost wrote:
EFFalcon wrote:
Hiboost wrote:what do u mean laggy how many people have the SNORT manifold on? a LOT and i had the SNORT one and LAG was never a PROBLEM, I also had a 1.5mm +two head gaskets and didnt notice anylag turbo spooled up at 2200RPM


surely you know its not just the manifold that effects how laggy it is.
2 points worth noting straight away, you're running a ball bearing turbo
you've also got a proper tune.

Shaun's car is running plain bearing'
shaun is also running stock ECU... with timing turned back a little
so offboost isnt as responsive, which also means more lag



ive had a std ecu, plain bearing turbo, my timing was turned back alot. i did 179rwk and did 105MPH +13.3 sec i never noticed any lag...oh plus a 1.5mm decomp plate and two head gaskets on top.


I'm surprised neither has brought up what turbos and exhaust housings you were running?
skidder
Idling
 
Posts: 125
Joined: May 26th, 2009, 3:55 pm
Location: Westside, Brisbane.
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 7:58 pm

I GIVE UP IM GOING TO WATCH T4, if u guys still want to continue keep posting...and ILL BE BACK
Last edited by Hiboost on June 4th, 2009, 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Commando » June 4th, 2009, 7:59 pm

a timely exit...
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 8:04 pm

Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby skidder » June 4th, 2009, 8:05 pm

Reading this thread after doing shitty uni work all day just made me so much happier. Is he for real?
skidder
Idling
 
Posts: 125
Joined: May 26th, 2009, 3:55 pm
Location: Westside, Brisbane.
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby SnyperEB » June 4th, 2009, 8:05 pm

Mr. CVE wrote:
Parfrey wrote:Mr. CVE do you think snypers car ran a good mph for 231rwkw?? was the there any factors that made it run slower than it should have?


Finally a real question that is worth answering.
And the answer to that is .... ( sorry shaun) NO.
It is not a good time for the power output.
And there are a few reasons for this, the way his turbo is setup it is very laggy and very peaky. in order to control detonation he has backed the timing off dramatically.
He has lower than std compression, which does not help.
I drove it the other day on the street and commented on how average it was off boost, but at the end of the day he was happy with it and decided to take it to heathcote. He wanted to run FULL street trim, so sub box in and all. std street tyres

For the record the dyno run was done with a different diff ratio to what he has now.

I would expect with some sticky tyres and a nice cold air intake and a tune it SHOULD run low 13's
but it is not up to me.
Oh and it hasn't been dynoed in a fair while so it may be a bit tired, or a bit better, who knows, mixtures could be out, who knows.
It's a bit hard to compare a dyno sheet from a couple years ago to a run at heathcote.

it would have been nice to say launch at more rpm but his tyres / suspension just would not allow it.


You have nothign to be sorry about Paul I knew that the car was certainly not going to do a massively great time due to all those factors but I went with it and I came out happy. I went with the intention of doing a 13 and I came home very happy.

Next time ill have an auto and no interior and Ill sit at the line and spool for 5mins then launch. :grin:
[EBGLT]
User avatar
SnyperEB
Shooting Flames
 
Posts: 6901
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 5:14 pm
Location: E-Series Owners Club
Has Liked: 138 times
Been Liked: 105 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 8:05 pm

Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.



LOL
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby [Sterling] » June 4th, 2009, 8:07 pm

Bluepower Racing Developments :cool:
2005 MK2 XR6Turbo-Leather-6speed manual-duel zone~weekender.
2011 Holden Colorado LXR-duel cab-Turbo Deisel~work rig/tow car
Boosted B-Series FTW E-Series GTFO.
User avatar
[Sterling]
Double Clutching
 
Posts: 5701
Joined: November 27th, 2007, 8:25 pm
Location: Im In Miami Trick!! a.k.a Chirnside park
Has Liked: 176 times
Been Liked: 189 times

1980 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Rollin » June 4th, 2009, 8:11 pm

Turbos are cheating anyway......hey...wait a second......


There are so many different things being argued about it's impossible to understand wtf is going on.

Cliff notes

a) Dynos are an indicator of how much power you have.

b) Trap speed is an indicator of how much power you have.

c) Beating the **** beside you at the lights or on the freeway is an indicator that your car is faster than his for the duration of the race at that point in time.

d) 4wd systems are **** for not giving me 11ty dollars to make my car faster than all you **** so I can be the supreme ruler of all the world and smash multiple boxes/session due to all the insanely hot bisexual chicks who are willing to share me with their friends because box cars are the shit, the whole shit and nothing but the shit.
Image

Look at your car. Now back to mine. Now back to yours. Now back to mine. Sadly, yours isn't mine. But if you stopped buying dodgy cars and bought an ED, yours could be like mine. Look down. Back up. Where are you? ...You're on BoostedFalcon, reading the signature your signature could be like! Anything is possible when your car looks like my car... I'm on a computer.
User avatar
Rollin
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: July 15th, 2007, 4:35 pm
Location: Brisbane - Driving around in a metal and glass case of emotion!
Has Liked: 327 times
Been Liked: 751 times

1994 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby someLS1 » June 4th, 2009, 8:21 pm

Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


Yer no shiiit.... my head hurts and i generally feel stupider

but the one thing that has pissed me off

Man credit to hiboost for running the 10.7...
Thats the biggest fuckin load ive shit ive ever heard spooling up is not a run
-Black VZ Calais 5.7ltr V8, cammed, stalled, built auto, 3.7s trutrac, FR19s and the rest. - 270rwkw 1/4 12.7 @ 112mph

-ENVI Green 04 BA XR6T ute, hardlid, 20s, bigger injectors, fuel pump, bigger cooler, dose pipe! dyno tune - 236rwkw
User avatar
someLS1
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1424
Joined: July 15th, 2007, 6:21 pm
Has Liked: 51 times
Been Liked: 64 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby SnyperEB » June 4th, 2009, 8:26 pm

Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.



:drinks2:
[EBGLT]
User avatar
SnyperEB
Shooting Flames
 
Posts: 6901
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 5:14 pm
Location: E-Series Owners Club
Has Liked: 138 times
Been Liked: 105 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby SnyperEB » June 4th, 2009, 8:37 pm

SLOLS1 wrote:
Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


Yer no shiiit.... my head hurts and i generally feel stupider

but the one thing that has pissed me off

Man credit to hiboost for running the 10.7...
Thats the biggest fuckin load ive shit ive ever heard spooling up is not a run


Sorry Max thats just how I feel. :P
[EBGLT]
User avatar
SnyperEB
Shooting Flames
 
Posts: 6901
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 5:14 pm
Location: E-Series Owners Club
Has Liked: 138 times
Been Liked: 105 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby John_LS1 » June 4th, 2009, 8:46 pm

I agree with rollin on the fact that beating the **** next to you at the lights is all that matters. if you lose then its time to spend more money.

Also spooling up for your run is fine, after all, arent you trying to get the best time possible? similar with stalling an N/A auto, launching at 3k in a manual. if you can get the traction go for it!

on another note (there is so many in this thread!) my ED when i had it made the same +-2kw on the CVE dyno and on the dynomotive dyno. same goes for my 1/4 times. heathcote and calder i had a 14.6
VZ Berlina 408 stroker, TH400 with TCE 4500 converter, 3.9's with trutrac, difilippo 1 7/8 headers and 3 inch Exhaust.
User avatar
John_LS1
Spooling Up
 
Posts: 749
Joined: July 16th, 2007, 1:11 am
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 4 times

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron