MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

This is a general discussion forum, open to all participants

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby glenneaux » June 4th, 2009, 8:50 pm

So all i'm picking up from this thread is, street tuning and street racing is where its at?

no dyno figures, no trap speeds...

Ask any racer. Any real racer.
It don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile. Winning's winning.
JZA80 Supra
2JZGTE, Getrag 6spd, TRD 320km/h speedo, TRD 10k rpm tacho, TRD fuel/water temp gauge.
HKS T51R SPL, GReddy Massive cooler, 5" Turbo Back exhaust, Motec M800, Titan 3.4L Stroker, Cusco triple plate clutch.
User avatar
glenneaux
Spooling Up
 
Posts: 832
Joined: July 26th, 2007, 6:23 pm
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 1 time

1994 Toyota Supra

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Commando » June 4th, 2009, 8:52 pm

That supra bodykit is getting to you, isn't it Glenn?
Previous: 1982 XE GL 3.3: 5 speed | 1991 EB Ghia 5.0: Vortech, Tiptronic, 4.11s, 232rwkw | 1995 EF GLi 4.0 wagon: LPG | 2006 BF Fairmont 4.0: JTG LiLPG
Now: 2016 Hilux SR HiRider
User avatar
Commando
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 11559
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Location: Stradbrokeback
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 516 times

2006 Ford Fairmont

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby 67rce » June 4th, 2009, 8:54 pm

Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.

MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.

Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks
Cammed Suzuki Baleno, Haltech PS1000, E85
User avatar
67rce
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: October 27th, 2007, 3:39 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has Liked: 170 times
Been Liked: 100 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby ebturb » June 4th, 2009, 8:55 pm

there are plenty of street tuned cars running good times as long as ya have a tuner who can tune and tunes his own car ect and not tuning em to the limit so they shit them self unless thats what they have been asked to do a good tune is a safe tune unless ya have heaps of money to be replacin motors
ebturb
Idling
 
Posts: 21
Joined: July 22nd, 2007, 10:19 pm
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 0 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 8:57 pm

67rce wrote:
Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.

MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.

Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks

No, a 10 second pass is when you cross the line at the end of the track 10 seconds after you break the beams at the christmas tree, you dickhead.
You can have your little pretend fantasy land rules, but out in the real world, what you are saying is called "fukking stupid"
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby ebturb » June 4th, 2009, 9:00 pm

67rce wrote:
Steady wrote:
Commando wrote:a timely exit...

why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.

MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.

Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks


its not cheating its fine if you are just going for times if you are bracket raceing ect then you will lose as it comes down to RT most of the time but we are not saying anythig like that go have a cry else where
ebturb
Idling
 
Posts: 21
Joined: July 22nd, 2007, 10:19 pm
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 0 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Michael (HYPOEB) » June 4th, 2009, 9:01 pm

i agree,what dose it matter if you sit there or not.
you go there to get the best time you can get.
thats like saying putting slicks on isnt a true 10 second pass.
like steady said,if you cross the line at 10 seconds then thats a true 10 second pass.
BA XT Wagon: Stock.

EA SVO: Stock.

EBT-747: -

Image
User avatar
Michael (HYPOEB)
Hitting N2O
 
Posts: 3125
Joined: November 4th, 2008, 3:09 pm
Location: Morwell Vic
Has Liked: 73 times
Been Liked: 261 times

1993 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 9:03 pm

if u were on the street, you've got a whole traffic light cycle to stall the car up :P
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby John_LS1 » June 4th, 2009, 9:04 pm

EFFalcon wrote:if u were on the street, you've got a whole traffic light cycle to stall the car up :P


We dont promote street racing here on boosted falcon. consider this an official warning.
VZ Berlina 408 stroker, TH400 with TCE 4500 converter, 3.9's with trutrac, difilippo 1 7/8 headers and 3 inch Exhaust.
User avatar
John_LS1
Spooling Up
 
Posts: 749
Joined: July 16th, 2007, 1:11 am
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 4 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby ebturb » June 4th, 2009, 9:05 pm

i like yor thinking john lol
ebturb
Idling
 
Posts: 21
Joined: July 22nd, 2007, 10:19 pm
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 0 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 9:08 pm

John_LS1 wrote:
EFFalcon wrote:if u were on the street, you've got a whole traffic light cycle to stall the car up :P


We dont promote street racing here on boosted falcon. consider this an official warning.

EDGHIA
Western Ring Road
Stockies
20psi (not boost either LOL)
Cut springs
BA XR6? Ute
200km/h


good old days :lol:
Last edited by Steady on June 4th, 2009, 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 9:10 pm

Most of u kents have no idea, so go get licked by those people and frk me for trying to help u guys from getting licked and getting no where
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EFFalcon » June 4th, 2009, 9:12 pm

how were you helping people?
you were so hell bent on trying to discredit any dyno figures from CVE.. i don't see where you've said anything constructive.

if u wana help... show us pics of ur damn plenum! hahaha :D :D :D :D :D
1995 Falcon GLi | 1997 EL GT | 1995 Falcon Futura | 1983 Thunderbird Heritage | 2003 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
EFFalcon
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14797
Joined: June 4th, 2007, 8:26 pm
Location: Carrum Downs
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 766 times

1995 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby t1MMy » June 4th, 2009, 9:12 pm

You've explained nothing and accused Paul of everything.

Pull ya bottom lip over ur head and swallow.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 9:13 pm

t1MMy, you will make a great law enforcement officer.
From the holier then thou attitude, to the barely concealed racism, you have it locked mate.
Good luck.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby t1MMy » June 4th, 2009, 9:15 pm

Thanks.
Ur avatar has it summed up pretty well.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby holmsy » June 4th, 2009, 9:22 pm

hey everyone i hear that hiboost guy gives high dyno figures. he rips people off

i wont tell you who but my mate wants me to have a bitch fight to help you all.
Project: SLOXR8: 1994 EF XR8, mech shift kit, 3500 histall, Lokka, 36lb injectors, AU 185 motor, Cranecam 444225, crane roller rockers, crow valve springs, Pacies, 3" exhaust, hiflo cats. twin 044's, vortech v2,microtech tuned by daltons (290.3rwkw @11psi) at DALTONS
Image
User avatar
holmsy
Shooting Flames
 
Posts: 6473
Joined: August 2nd, 2007, 11:07 pm
Location: Geelong
Has Liked: 182 times
Been Liked: 154 times

1994 Ford XR8

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby 67rce » June 4th, 2009, 9:24 pm

Steady wrote:
67rce wrote:
Steady wrote:why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"

I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.


A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.

MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.

Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks

No, a 10 second pass is when you cross the line at the end of the track 10 seconds after you break the beams at the christmas tree, you dickhead.
You can have your little pretend fantasy land rules, but out in the real world, what you are saying is called "fukking stupid"


Yes, but try doing it without spooling for 10 seconds, probably will not run a 10sec pass
Cammed Suzuki Baleno, Haltech PS1000, E85
User avatar
67rce
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: October 27th, 2007, 3:39 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has Liked: 170 times
Been Liked: 100 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Fritzz » June 4th, 2009, 9:29 pm

lol this tread is funny.... lots of bs
# 1997 EL Falcon GLI - Custom built AU 4L bottom end, Precision PT8285, Nizpro plenum, 6boost manifold, Autronic SM4, Custom billet camtech camshaft, Custom 4" exhaust with magnaflow mufler, ID2000 injectors, 60mm Turbosmart gate, Turbosmart race port BOV, Turbosmart FPR1200 reg, , Reid powerglide, Cebco 330mm Brakes, 3.5:1 9" diff with billet axles and trutrack center, E85!857rwhp

# 2008 FPV FG GTE - Stock on sssl's
User avatar
Fritzz
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: August 3rd, 2007, 10:48 pm
Location: WA
Has Liked: 71 times
Been Liked: 233 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Steady » June 4th, 2009, 9:30 pm

67rce wrote:Yes, but try doing it without spooling for 10 seconds, probably will not run a 10sec pass

Who cares?
It's not bracket racing, and if it was, you'd use n2o to get it up on the stall?
Like I said man, your fairy land rules don't apply out here.
User avatar
Steady
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4505
Joined: July 14th, 2007, 4:10 pm
Location: Melburn, where crackpipes burn speed
Has Liked: 1 time
Been Liked: 10 times

1993 Ford XR8 Sprint

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby needfordspeed » June 4th, 2009, 9:33 pm

OK

Back on track now...103MPH doesn't equal 231rwkw. That is all.

Timmy, you're the new Frost **** your posts are annoying.
1988 EA S-Pack - 10.6@125MPH New build underway
User avatar
needfordspeed
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5256
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 2:13 pm
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 417 times

1988 Ford S Pack

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby skidder » June 4th, 2009, 9:38 pm

needfordspeed wrote:OK

Back on track now...103MPH doesn't equal 231rwkw. That is all.


Ditto, not even close.
skidder
Idling
 
Posts: 125
Joined: May 26th, 2009, 3:55 pm
Location: Westside, Brisbane.
Has Liked: 2 times
Been Liked: 2 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby 67rce » June 4th, 2009, 9:50 pm

Steady wrote:
67rce wrote:Yes, but try doing it without spooling for 10 seconds, probably will not run a 10sec pass

Who cares?
It's not bracket racing, and if it was, you'd use n2o to get it up on the stall?
Like I said man, your fairy land rules don't apply out here.


Meh, it's just my thoughts, everyone is free to have their own opinion
Cammed Suzuki Baleno, Haltech PS1000, E85
User avatar
67rce
Breaking Intake Welds
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: October 27th, 2007, 3:39 pm
Location: Brisbane
Has Liked: 170 times
Been Liked: 100 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby LTDHO » June 4th, 2009, 10:35 pm

Hiboost wrote:ive had a std ecu, plain bearing turbo, my timing was turned back alot. i did 179rwk and did 105MPH +13.3 sec i never noticed any lag...oh plus a 1.5mm decomp plate and two head gaskets on top.

This was with auto yeah?
So you left on boost right?
Unlike Shaun's, being a manual and all?

I don't know why you shit can Shaun and his tuner all based on what ya mates tell you.
Meh!! WGAF? Really WHO GIVES A FUCK!!!!!

You go you your tuner
Shaun goes to his.
Ya both happy. Pretty fuckin' simple really.
Image
Going of the rails on a crazy train
User avatar
LTDHO
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2527
Joined: July 15th, 2007, 10:02 pm
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Has Liked: 20 times
Been Liked: 36 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby t1MMy » June 4th, 2009, 10:36 pm

needfordspeed wrote:Timmy, you're the new Frost

That hurt.
User avatar
t1MMy
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2977
Joined: June 29th, 2008, 11:11 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 30 times
Been Liked: 45 times

1995 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby needfordspeed » June 4th, 2009, 10:38 pm

Maybe it was a bit harsh ey
1988 EA S-Pack - 10.6@125MPH New build underway
User avatar
needfordspeed
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5256
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 2:13 pm
Has Liked: 110 times
Been Liked: 417 times

1988 Ford S Pack

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Tiga_EL » June 4th, 2009, 10:57 pm

+1 with not understanding how stalling up at the line is "cheating". Would this then also mean that getting a transbrake is also cheating? isnt that the same dealio?
User avatar
Tiga_EL
Cruising
 
Posts: 338
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 9:34 pm
Has Liked: 5 times
Been Liked: 1 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Sunboost » June 4th, 2009, 11:01 pm

Niggaaa what. 4 pages since I left work. Got some reading to do.
Edge FG G6ET 50th Anniversary
Vixen BF F6 R-Spec
User avatar
Sunboost
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 6900
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:18 am
Has Liked: 98 times
Been Liked: 471 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Bomber » June 4th, 2009, 11:16 pm

John_LS1 wrote:on another note (there is so many in this thread!) my ED when i had it made the same +-2kw on the hallam dyno (cve opperating it) and on the dynomotive dyno.


Yep my AU has done the same John.


Hiboost you have given no facts to support Paul being at fault of doing anything wrong as a tuner.For all we know the Stig could have been driving this VR riding the limiter before catastrophic failure occured

And what has some VR got to do with Trap speed and an estimated figure a dyno reads????
My Rides
2000 AUII Fairmont Wagon - 1999 AU XR6 6 speed < Click for build thread.
Image
User avatar
Bomber
Full Boost
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: July 16th, 2007, 11:28 am
Location: Narre Warren South
Has Liked: 4 times
Been Liked: 13 times

1999 Ford XR6

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Bipolar » June 4th, 2009, 11:23 pm

Agreed. He's full of contradiction that's grabbing people's attention enough to want him to spit out what fukk he's really on about after 8 pages.

Hiboost - If this thread really relates to the title, then make a poll and get it over with:

Question
Is the correlation between ET speed and RWKW reliable enough to make direct comparisons between different vehicles?

Options
Yes
No
Who gives a flying fucktard
Image
RBKILA wrote:yes im sure 99% of the hate is just jealousy from morons.
the same sort of people you see at bathurst, wearing all the hrt gear and then you see them get into a camry in the car park lol
User avatar
Bipolar
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4493
Joined: July 24th, 2007, 6:49 pm
Has Liked: 741 times
Been Liked: 225 times

1997 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Sunboost » June 4th, 2009, 11:32 pm

Zommagawd I read the whole 4 pages and got to this:

SnyperEB wrote:When it comes down to it you can be a tight arse, you get shit results, you spend big you get quality, performance and reliability. I know I have all three of them as the $15k or more so I have sunk into that engine has been worth it and I know exactly what its for.

WADDAFUKZ bro? Tell me there's a BA XR6 Turbo jammed under the bonnet of your EB?

If you want quality, performance and reliability you shoulda bought a BA XR6T for that cash.

And yeah, then you shoulda got a tune, injectors and CAI - pumped out 260 and run a 12. Just like everyone else has.

Fukn win.

Conform you cvnt!!
Edge FG G6ET 50th Anniversary
Vixen BF F6 R-Spec
User avatar
Sunboost
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 6900
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:18 am
Has Liked: 98 times
Been Liked: 471 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 11:36 pm

Bipolar wrote:Agreed. He's full of contradiction that's grabbing people's attention enough to want him to spit out what fukk he's really on about after 8 pages.

Hiboost - If this thread really relates to the title, then make a poll and get it over with:

Question
Is the correlation between ET speed and RWKW reliable enough to make direct comparisons between different vehicles?

Options
Yes
No
Who gives a flying fucktard


im NOT the one who twisted and turned the thread...
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 4th, 2009, 11:49 pm

EBGLT, u said u spent $15k on the engine.. what exactly do u have thats cost 15K?
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MR.CVE u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Bipolar » June 4th, 2009, 11:59 pm

From page 6:
Hiboost wrote:
SnyperEB wrote:I have a dyno sheet to prove it..... coz CVE is honest.

Why go to Rajab when I have someone with years of experience who built my car, who tunes my car, who has driven my car and knows what its capable of. Then go to guys who have no idea about my car. Now that sounds like a smart idea!! Ill stick with CVE and you stick with wherever you are.

When it comes down to it you can be a tight arse, you get shit results, you spend big you get quality, performance and reliability. I know I have all three of them as the $15k or more so I have sunk into that engine has been worth it and I know exactly what its for. I have wanted to take short cuts and Paul has pulled me up and said no do this. And have a look at the car now. With a cam, ECU, injectors and a tune that engine is capable of making making 280+rwkw safely.

You should hang around the Rajab factory for a day you may here stories of some dodgy shit you might not but every performance car company has a deep dark mishap that is swept away that you will here of I guarantee you that.

You indeed my friend have no right to be questioning the CVE credibility.



is that $15k just on engine?

From page 7:
SnyperEB wrote:Nope.
Image
RBKILA wrote:yes im sure 99% of the hate is just jealousy from morons.
the same sort of people you see at bathurst, wearing all the hrt gear and then you see them get into a camry in the car park lol
User avatar
Bipolar
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4493
Joined: July 24th, 2007, 6:49 pm
Has Liked: 741 times
Been Liked: 225 times

1997 Ford Falcon

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Parfrey » June 5th, 2009, 12:21 am

EFFalcon wrote:how were you helping people?
you were so hell bent on trying to discredit any dyno figures from CVE.. i don't see where you've said anything constructive.

if u wana help... show us pics of ur damn plenum! hahaha :D :D :D :D :D


i'm pretty sure he was trying to help by saying synper is getting ripped off because it looks like his car has less power than the dyno says.. alot less.
then everyone arced up cos someone said something bad about cve!
FG GT335 Tune only 376rwkw
GU Patrol TD42t @30psi
User avatar
Parfrey
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1944
Joined: August 12th, 2007, 6:34 pm
Has Liked: 82 times
Been Liked: 131 times

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 5th, 2009, 12:25 am

Parfrey wrote:
EFFalcon wrote:how were you helping people?
you were so hell bent on trying to discredit any dyno figures from CVE.. i don't see where you've said anything constructive.

if u wana help... show us pics of ur damn plenum! hahaha :D :D :D :D :D


i'm pretty sure he was trying to help by saying synper is getting ripped off because it looks like his car has less power than the dyno says.. alot less.
then everyone arced up cos someone said something bad about cve!



thats Spot on, i dont care if some of these tossers get ripped NOW seems like they deserve it....
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Dansedgli » June 5th, 2009, 12:33 am

Holy Shit Shaun - $15k for 230rwkw with a plain bearing turbo and no ecu??!! You should listen to steady more often.

I gave my EB to rank rotary and they fitted and tuned everything including modifying an intercooler, modifying a manifold, installing 500cc injectors and a wolf v4 for under $8k. That was with a roller bearing 35/40 turbo that cost me $2k on its own back in the day. Even the injectors were $1200 back then. :S
User avatar
Dansedgli
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 9734
Joined: July 13th, 2007, 11:35 am
Location: Melbourne
Has Liked: 75 times
Been Liked: 542 times

2001 Ford Falcon Ute

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Hiboost » June 5th, 2009, 12:34 am

Dansedgli wrote:Holy Shit Shaun - $15k for 230rwkw with a plain bearing turbo and no ecu??!! You should listen to steady more often.

I gave my EB to rank rotary and they fitted and tuned everything including modifying an intercooler, modifying a manifold, installing 500cc injectors and a wolf v4 for under $8k. That was with a roller bearing 35/40 turbo that cost me $2k on its own back in the day.



even if he spent 8k on the engine i dont see anything to prove 8k worth.
4LTR-JET: 9.1@ 150mph!!



Check out our new revamped website!
http://www.turbologicracing.com.au/
Image
User avatar
Hiboost
Breaking Traction
 
Posts: 1951
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 am
Has Liked: 11 times
Been Liked: 24 times

1997 Ford EL

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby EBTO4Z » June 5th, 2009, 12:47 am

This so funny, I'm trying to stop reading is B/S but i cant. I have to get up for work in 3 hours, I'm going to be so tied at work tomorrow i mean today f@#k Lol. Tomato, tomahto. who really cares...
1992 EB Fairmont, turboed AU engine, E-boost 2
manualised C4 3000 stall, LSD, momo streering wheel,
cobra bucket seats with harnesses, lowered with
ROH drift R 18x8...
User avatar
EBTO4Z
Idling
 
Posts: 187
Joined: May 13th, 2008, 8:21 pm
Location: penrith (sydney)
Has Liked: 0 time
Been Liked: 1 time

Re: MPH VS RWKW u sure u want to go ahead?

Postby Rollin » June 5th, 2009, 2:29 am

Dansedgli wrote:Holy Shit Shaun - $15k for 230rwkw with a plain bearing turbo and no ecu??!! You should listen to steady more often.

I gave my EB to rank rotary and they fitted and tuned everything including modifying an intercooler, modifying a manifold, installing 500cc injectors and a wolf v4 for under $8k. That was with a roller bearing 35/40 turbo that cost me $2k on its own back in the day. Even the injectors were $1200 back then. :S


Lol now this thread will turn into claimed rwkw VS mph to claimed rwkw VS dollars spent. Nice one.






P.S. My car makes not enough rwkw @ too many$$$ :)
Image

Look at your car. Now back to mine. Now back to yours. Now back to mine. Sadly, yours isn't mine. But if you stopped buying dodgy cars and bought an ED, yours could be like mine. Look down. Back up. Where are you? ...You're on BoostedFalcon, reading the signature your signature could be like! Anything is possible when your car looks like my car... I'm on a computer.
User avatar
Rollin
Melting Pistons
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: July 15th, 2007, 4:35 pm
Location: Brisbane - Driving around in a metal and glass case of emotion!
Has Liked: 327 times
Been Liked: 751 times

1994 Ford Falcon

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron