Steady wrote:Commando wrote:a timely exit...
why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"
I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.
67rce wrote:Steady wrote:Commando wrote:a timely exit...
why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"
I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.
A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.
MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.
Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks
67rce wrote:Steady wrote:Commando wrote:a timely exit...
why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"
I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.
A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.
MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.
Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks
EFFalcon wrote:if u were on the street, you've got a whole traffic light cycle to stall the car up
John_LS1 wrote:EFFalcon wrote:if u were on the street, you've got a whole traffic light cycle to stall the car up
We dont promote street racing here on boosted falcon. consider this an official warning.
Steady wrote:67rce wrote:Steady wrote:why, because the retard brigade have got no more pearls of wisdom to share with us?
MPH is no indicator of power.
A 10 second pass where you have to spool up is not a real 10 second pass.
Fukk, I am just waiting for someone to say "turbos are cheating anyway"
I have never ever ever seen so much stupidity displayed in one thread on this forum before, it literally repulses me.
A 10 second pass where you leave the line with a sub 1.5 sec reaction, true 10sec pass, a 10 sec pass with a 3-10 sec reaction because you are sitting on the line building boost to launch, not a true 10 sec pass, as you should be ready to launch on the last yellow.
MPH is just that, an indicator of POTENTIAL power, it comes down to weight, drag, etc.
Turbo's are cheating cause i dont have one jks
No, a 10 second pass is when you cross the line at the end of the track 10 seconds after you break the beams at the christmas tree, you dickhead.
You can have your little pretend fantasy land rules, but out in the real world, what you are saying is called "fukking stupid"
67rce wrote:Yes, but try doing it without spooling for 10 seconds, probably will not run a 10sec pass
needfordspeed wrote:OK
Back on track now...103MPH doesn't equal 231rwkw. That is all.
Steady wrote:67rce wrote:Yes, but try doing it without spooling for 10 seconds, probably will not run a 10sec pass
Who cares?
It's not bracket racing, and if it was, you'd use n2o to get it up on the stall?
Like I said man, your fairy land rules don't apply out here.
Hiboost wrote:ive had a std ecu, plain bearing turbo, my timing was turned back alot. i did 179rwk and did 105MPH +13.3 sec i never noticed any lag...oh plus a 1.5mm decomp plate and two head gaskets on top.
needfordspeed wrote:Timmy, you're the new Frost
John_LS1 wrote:on another note (there is so many in this thread!) my ED when i had it made the same +-2kw on the hallam dyno (cve opperating it) and on the dynomotive dyno.
SnyperEB wrote:When it comes down to it you can be a tight arse, you get shit results, you spend big you get quality, performance and reliability. I know I have all three of them as the $15k or more so I have sunk into that engine has been worth it and I know exactly what its for.
Bipolar wrote:Agreed. He's full of contradiction that's grabbing people's attention enough to want him to spit out what fukk he's really on about after 8 pages.
Hiboost - If this thread really relates to the title, then make a poll and get it over with:
Question
Is the correlation between ET speed and RWKW reliable enough to make direct comparisons between different vehicles?
Options
Yes
No
Who gives a flying fucktard
Hiboost wrote:SnyperEB wrote:I have a dyno sheet to prove it..... coz CVE is honest.
Why go to Rajab when I have someone with years of experience who built my car, who tunes my car, who has driven my car and knows what its capable of. Then go to guys who have no idea about my car. Now that sounds like a smart idea!! Ill stick with CVE and you stick with wherever you are.
When it comes down to it you can be a tight arse, you get shit results, you spend big you get quality, performance and reliability. I know I have all three of them as the $15k or more so I have sunk into that engine has been worth it and I know exactly what its for. I have wanted to take short cuts and Paul has pulled me up and said no do this. And have a look at the car now. With a cam, ECU, injectors and a tune that engine is capable of making making 280+rwkw safely.
You should hang around the Rajab factory for a day you may here stories of some dodgy shit you might not but every performance car company has a deep dark mishap that is swept away that you will here of I guarantee you that.
You indeed my friend have no right to be questioning the CVE credibility.
is that $15k just on engine?
SnyperEB wrote:Nope.
EFFalcon wrote:how were you helping people?
you were so hell bent on trying to discredit any dyno figures from CVE.. i don't see where you've said anything constructive.
if u wana help... show us pics of ur damn plenum! hahaha![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Parfrey wrote:EFFalcon wrote:how were you helping people?
you were so hell bent on trying to discredit any dyno figures from CVE.. i don't see where you've said anything constructive.
if u wana help... show us pics of ur damn plenum! hahaha![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i'm pretty sure he was trying to help by saying synper is getting ripped off because it looks like his car has less power than the dyno says.. alot less.
then everyone arced up cos someone said something bad about cve!
Dansedgli wrote:Holy Shit Shaun - $15k for 230rwkw with a plain bearing turbo and no ecu??!! You should listen to steady more often.
I gave my EB to rank rotary and they fitted and tuned everything including modifying an intercooler, modifying a manifold, installing 500cc injectors and a wolf v4 for under $8k. That was with a roller bearing 35/40 turbo that cost me $2k on its own back in the day.
Dansedgli wrote:Holy Shit Shaun - $15k for 230rwkw with a plain bearing turbo and no ecu??!! You should listen to steady more often.
I gave my EB to rank rotary and they fitted and tuned everything including modifying an intercooler, modifying a manifold, installing 500cc injectors and a wolf v4 for under $8k. That was with a roller bearing 35/40 turbo that cost me $2k on its own back in the day. Even the injectors were $1200 back then. :S
Users browsing this forum: No registered users