Rollin wrote:Watch this space people - the man from the bush can steer
Steady wrote:lets stop beating around the bush here, who are you calling a bullshit artist?
Revengelane wrote:Wow........ a simple yes or no would do...
Revengelane wrote:
Opinions??
Gozza wrote:LOL - need employment much Brett? I know what Matt is saying. I don't know if its directed at anybody in particular
Steady wrote:I assumed/hoped someone would get called out![]()
I reckon the thread works better then a database, it comes up as a new post when it gets updated so i wont miss it when TUFED6 runs a 9.
Also any shenanigans get spotted quicker for the same reason.
It also gives people the opportunity to post extra info (boost/tyre type/excuses).
vulpine wrote:well if i dont have to provide a dyno or time slip i ran a 7.1 second 1/4 and have a 1200rwkw ea stock pistons and rods and its na.
i think any stats should come with some sort of proof even if its just a g tech readout.
Its not even a question of trust, it is a question of how accurate the statistics are.
e.g. a 1/4 with a stop watch compared to 1/4 with an offical timing system.....big difference in accuracy.
Rollin wrote:vulpine wrote:well if i dont have to provide a dyno or time slip i ran a 7.1 second 1/4 and have a 1200rwkw ea stock pistons and rods and its na.
i think any stats should come with some sort of proof even if its just a g tech readout.
Its not even a question of trust, it is a question of how accurate the statistics are.
e.g. a 1/4 with a stop watch compared to 1/4 with an offical timing system.....big difference in accuracy.
Soooo.....if your car makes 1200rwkw N/A...how much power would it make with 20psi...?
Malakai wrote:Gozza wrote:LOL - need employment much Brett? I know what Matt is saying. I don't know if its directed at anybody in particular
I recon you fudged your dyno figure gozza, I haven't seen a sheet yet.
16psi to make 300hp... sucks to be you. You know everyone is thinking it.
Dumpsta wrote:Rollin wrote:vulpine wrote:well if i dont have to provide a dyno or time slip i ran a 7.1 second 1/4 and have a 1200rwkw ea stock pistons and rods and its na.
i think any stats should come with some sort of proof even if its just a g tech readout.
Its not even a question of trust, it is a question of how accurate the statistics are.
e.g. a 1/4 with a stop watch compared to 1/4 with an offical timing system.....big difference in accuracy.
Soooo.....if your car makes 1200rwkw N/A...how much power would it make with 20psi...?
Im sure he meant 17.1 seconds...and 120fwkw.
EDIT: Why cant you provide us with a duno or time slip.... disappointment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users