53 in a 50 zone?!?!?!?! that is a load of it....3 k's over.....i'd be livid if i got done for that ayeEDFalcon wrote:Halo you cant practice law with a criminal record can you?? If you lose it and hit someone and you were speeding you'd get a criminal record. Thought you'd have been a bit more sensible than that.
Wish i knew about that official warning thing. My first fine was 51 (taken down from 53 from the camera tollerance) in a 50 zone. Shoulda written in!!! Though that was years ago.
Steady the MARTYR! wrote:"you are a fucking idiot sometimes Jared".
halo wrote:im on ps and lost it for 3 months for doin 42kms over (which was an absolute joke - thought it was a 80 zone, justified the extra 20km/h due to 1. no other cars on road (xcept unmarked police car camping behind a fence) 2. a bridge, so no pedestrians on path 3. road as smooth as jessica alba 4. i knew the turns etc so woulkdn't crash. Tell this on aff and its like ww3 the dumb farks... but yeh, i got 609$ fine and auto 3 months, also this pushed my points over the limit so another 3 months.. got 2 and a bit left then im free
halo wrote:its illegal but i justify it as ok... aha i know that sounds a bit crazy but think about it.. parliament has the ability to make a law on anything they want. i study law and should the government so decide it would be legally, albeit not socially, acceptably to create a law allowing for the killing of all babies with say blue eyes for example. How does this relate to my speeding? Just because something is legally enforceable does not mean that it is socially correct. For me, going 100 over the anzac bridge with no traffic is acceptable - i was in control, knew my car/road, if something did go wrong it was only me to go anyway.
i dont speed in those 60km/h streets with a million driveways, bumps, and trees
this is what i sped on: http://www.top-city-photos.com/images/A ... Bridge.JPG
without traffic/pedestrians i dont see the big deal. Its pretty much just a big 4 lane each way highway, similar to the one up to newcastle which you can go over 100 with traffic.
holmsy wrote:i think the main thing that keeps people like me out of fines is, speeding only when ya know the area and when there is very little chance of harming anyone else.
or speeding on the highway in geelong doin 80 in 70 zone cause even the cops do that
Lockie wrote:You can't speak English good because you came here on a leaking door!
SDKC wrote:holmsy wrote:i think the main thing that keeps people like me out of fines is, speeding only when ya know the area and when there is very little chance of harming anyone else.
or speeding on the highway in geelong doin 80 in 70 zone cause even the cops do that
Cops are exempt.
halo wrote:i knew the turns etc so woulkdn't crash.
Commando wrote:seriously, this thread is now a complete cyber skip bin filled with all kinds of waste from the internet...
SDKC wrote:holmsy wrote:i think the main thing that keeps people like me out of fines is, speeding only when ya know the area and when there is very little chance of harming anyone else.
or speeding on the highway in geelong doin 80 in 70 zone cause even the cops do that
Cops are exempt.
kester94EF wrote:so what your saying is that is a police officer driving a unmarked/marked car, driving at a speed above the limit with no warning lights or sirens is alowed to, but if a but if a bloke in a VE comodore does it, its Hooning/speeding.
im pretty sure police cars, (unless there got sirens and lights on) have to obey the law.
but if youve got hard evidince(sp?) that says that coppa's can do whateva the want then hell ill stand corected.
abcisfun wrote:I got done going down the hill!! didnt even fuckin know they're allowed to go thru trees
abcisfun wrote:It was 71 in a 60 zone
3 demerit points!
fordbaby wrote:speeding is speeding regardless. if there were trees i thought you would slow down a bit for safety?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users